Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #681656

Re: irreproducibility crisis

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Am 18.04.2018 um 19:31 schrieb The Starmaker:

>>> "Half the results published in peer-reviewed scientific journals are probably wrong.
>>
>> The problem is: they don't know which half....
>>
>> TH
>
>
>
> you have to write it in a way...that the person reading it doesn't
> understand it.
>
>
> All you have to do is throw in a lot of numbers and the reader...
>

Well, there are many ways possible, if your intention is to disturb the 
readers mind.

First you need dogmas, that are blatantly wrong, but absolutely 
untouchable.

E.g. I'm a proponent of the so called 'Growing Earth' hypothesis. I have 
actually spent years on that subject and have written hundreds of 
messages to various forums. But my arguments are always rejected, since 
'it cannot be true, because it violates the laws'.

To question the 'laws' itself is prohibited and once a professional 
does, he will almost certainly loose his job.

Other 'law' is 'the universal speed limit of c'.

Someone found, that neutrinos travel faster than c (and subsequently got 
fired).

We have also the Russian Podclednov, who found certain gravitational 
effects from spinning super-conductive rings (got banned and fired).

(This goes on and on and on...)


TH

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

irreproducibility crisis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-17 10:01 -0700
  Re: irreproducibility crisis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 10:50 -0700
  Re: irreproducibility crisis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-17 11:03 -0700
    Re: irreproducibility crisis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 08:26 -0700
  Re: irreproducibility crisis Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-04-18 16:39 +0200
    Re: irreproducibility crisis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-18 10:31 -0700
      Re: irreproducibility crisis Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-04-19 18:46 +0200
        Re: irreproducibility crisis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-04-19 14:14 -0700
        Re: irreproducibility crisis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-19 23:45 -0700
          Re: irreproducibility crisis Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-04-20 17:54 +0200
            Re: irreproducibility crisis Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-24 10:33 -0500
            Re: irreproducibility crisis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-24 09:01 -0700
              Re: irreproducibility crisis Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-04-24 18:39 +0200
                Re: irreproducibility crisis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-24 09:50 -0700
                Re: irreproducibility crisis Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-04-25 14:26 +0200

csiph-web