Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.astronomy Subject: Re: irreproducibility crisis Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 23:45:39 -0700 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 70 Message-ID: <5AD98C93.5884@ix.netcom.com> References: <5AD62852.4706@ix.netcom.com> <5AD78102.4F6D@ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com NNTP-Posting-Host: X9ItFNC7Zcz4l6MobL/YRA.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.3 X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 180419-4, 04/19/2018), Outbound message Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:681741 sci.physics.relativity:456466 alt.astronomy:298183 Thomas Heger wrote: > > Am 18.04.2018 um 19:31 schrieb The Starmaker: > > >>> "Half the results published in peer-reviewed scientific journals are probably wrong. > >> > >> The problem is: they don't know which half.... > >> > >> TH > > > > > > > > you have to write it in a way...that the person reading it doesn't > > understand it. > > > > > > All you have to do is throw in a lot of numbers and the reader... > > > > Well, there are many ways possible, if your intention is to disturb the > readers mind. > > First you need dogmas, that are blatantly wrong, but absolutely > untouchable. > > E.g. I'm a proponent of the so called 'Growing Earth' hypothesis. I have > actually spent years on that subject and have written hundreds of > messages to various forums. But my arguments are always rejected, since > 'it cannot be true, because it violates the laws'. > > To question the 'laws' itself is prohibited and once a professional > does, he will almost certainly loose his job. > > Other 'law' is 'the universal speed limit of c'. > > Someone found, that neutrinos travel faster than c (and subsequently got > fired). > > We have also the Russian Podclednov, who found certain gravitational > effects from spinning super-conductive rings (got banned and fired). > > (This goes on and on and on...) > > TH according to Albert Einstein...'in his own words' he said: 'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.' http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/ http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/ocr/ http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3.pdf ""Why were men of science opposed to your theory when you first made it known ?" "No men of science," he replied, em phasizing the last'word, "were against the theory." "But there was some opposition?" "Yes," was the quiet reply, "but that was purely political. Even the physi cists who opposed my theory did so for political reasons?in my opinion, o' course." "What do you mean when you say the opposition was political?" "Anti-Semitism," was the scientist's answer. "Because I am a Jew." ""