Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #681402
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Tue, 17 Apr 2018 13:03:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5AD636F8.1E15@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| Date | Tue, 17 Apr 2018 11:03:36 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Reply-To | starmaker@ix.netcom.com |
| X-Mailer | Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy |
| Subject | Re: irreproducibility crisis |
| References | <5AD62852.4706@ix.netcom.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Antivirus | Avast (VPS 180417-4, 04/17/2018), Outbound message |
| X-Antivirus-Status | Clean |
| Lines | 10 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 108.219.229.47 |
| X-Trace | sv3-HI2oYPoq5eR/+CC8JyQ6N5qJnUoX5cRz75dVx9/3WFd/PGB56BpZkvK955ROmjy4qH4QR8m2j1N6ovr!F85JAZqr/P8KaLMLHz+LafONVjjq5ZkgGcLMaLriB2J6X93T9OtsMHfI4kUjlt7O7lsywT/oLBOj!kgh6aLzlu8Q= |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 1656 |
| Xref | csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:490535 sci.physics:681402 sci.physics.relativity:456228 alt.astronomy:298131 |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
The Starmaker wrote: > > "Half the results published in peer-reviewed scientific journals are probably wrong. > John Ioannidis, now a professor of medicine at Stanford, made headlines with that claim in 2005. > Since then, researchers have confirmed his skepticism by trying—and often failing—to reproduce many influential journal articles. > Slowly, scientists are internalizing the lessons of this irreproducibility crisis." https://www.nas.org/projects/irreproducibility_report
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
irreproducibility crisis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-17 10:01 -0700
Re: irreproducibility crisis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 10:50 -0700
Re: irreproducibility crisis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-17 11:03 -0700
Re: irreproducibility crisis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 08:26 -0700
Re: irreproducibility crisis Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-04-18 16:39 +0200
Re: irreproducibility crisis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-18 10:31 -0700
Re: irreproducibility crisis Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-04-19 18:46 +0200
Re: irreproducibility crisis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-04-19 14:14 -0700
Re: irreproducibility crisis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-19 23:45 -0700
Re: irreproducibility crisis Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-04-20 17:54 +0200
Re: irreproducibility crisis Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-24 10:33 -0500
Re: irreproducibility crisis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-24 09:01 -0700
Re: irreproducibility crisis Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-04-24 18:39 +0200
Re: irreproducibility crisis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-24 09:50 -0700
Re: irreproducibility crisis Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-04-25 14:26 +0200
csiph-web