Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > rec.arts.sf.written > #490535
| Message-ID | <5AD636F8.1E15@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-17 11:03 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy |
| Subject | Re: irreproducibility crisis |
| References | <5AD62852.4706@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
The Starmaker wrote: > > "Half the results published in peer-reviewed scientific journals are probably wrong. > John Ioannidis, now a professor of medicine at Stanford, made headlines with that claim in 2005. > Since then, researchers have confirmed his skepticism by trying—and often failing—to reproduce many influential journal articles. > Slowly, scientists are internalizing the lessons of this irreproducibility crisis." https://www.nas.org/projects/irreproducibility_report
Back to rec.arts.sf.written | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
irreproducibility crisis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-17 10:01 -0700
Re: irreproducibility crisis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-17 11:03 -0700
Re: irreproducibility crisis mcdowell_ag@sky.com - 2018-04-18 11:29 -0700
csiph-web