Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #636536

Re: our twin star

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Bast wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > Hägar wrote:
> >>
> >> "The Starmaker"  wrote in message news:5942AFF8.3999@ix.netcom.com...
> >>
> >> a new study reports that almost all sun-like stars are likely born with
> >> companions
> >> https://www.space.com/37186-sun-long-lost-twin-nemesis.html
> >> https://www.sciencealert.com/all-stars-might-be-born-with-a-twin-and-we-ve-called-ours-nemesis
> >>
> >> Now, let me explain it all for yous...
> >>
> >> You can look at the big dipper or little dipper
> >> and see the twin stars...and one of the twins...died.
> >>
> >> Twin stars have a pipeline that transfer energy to each other. If
> >> the star drifts away...the pipeline is broken, and the star begins to
> >> die.
> >>
> >> Twin stars are one positive and one negative.
> >>
> >> Now, what hasn't been discovered yet (i'm waiting for a thousand years
> >> for you
> >> people to catch up with my genuies)
> >>
> >> what hasn't been discovered yet ...is
> >>
> >> every single person is a twin molded into one person.
> >>
> >> That means, stars not also drift away, but they also meld into one.
> >>
> >> So, those stupid people looking for our twin star ...some where else...
> >> need to look a little closer at our sun and they will find the twin.
> >>
> >> (i give them another thousand years to find that out)
> >>
> >> The Starmaker
> >>
> >> ***boy oh boy ... you're right up there with treBert, that other
> >> manufacturer of putrid brain farts.  You two even misspell words
> >> the same way ... are you by any chance hanging onto delusions
> >> of a Nobel Prize, like your bro treBert???
> >
> >
> >
> > Is there something you disagree with you need to point it out otherwise
> > you have not a leg to stand on.
> >
> >
> > (but i don't subscribe to drive by shootings as yourself)
> 
> Aww God Damn it.
> Quit making me continually agree with Hagar. This is starting to piss me
> off.
> 
> You really are a nutcase to even dare post the drivel you did.
> And if you want another opinion,....you probably smell bad too.
> 
> BTW What is your position on Democrat Bernie Sanders Supporters shooting
> republican politicians who were playing baseball ?
> And then hundreds of anti-trumper people on the net calling the shooter a
> HERO ?
> 
> Widespread brainwashing, or just mental illness ?


Is there something you disagree with, .. you need to point it out,
otherwise
 you also have not a leg to.. stand on.


(and i don't subscribe to drive by shootings)

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 09:04 -0700
  Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-15 09:16 -0700
    Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 09:26 -0700
      Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-15 09:31 -0700
        Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-17 14:38 +0200
          Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-17 11:51 -0700
            Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-17 22:34 +0200
              Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-17 17:46 -0700
        Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-17 10:20 -0700
          Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-17 10:30 -0700
      Re: our twin star "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2017-06-15 14:57 -0400
        Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 12:15 -0700
          Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 12:27 -0700
            Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 14:19 -0700
        Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 13:40 -0700
          Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 14:14 -0700
            Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 14:30 -0700
            Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 15:43 -0700
              Re: our twin star benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-15 19:24 -0400
                Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 18:20 -0700
                Re: our twin star benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-15 22:38 -0400
                Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-16 16:18 -0700
                Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 20:24 -0700
              Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 17:04 -0700
          Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-16 10:45 -0700
            Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-16 11:07 -0700
    Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-15 20:38 +0200
      Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 12:27 -0700
        Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-15 22:44 +0200
  Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 15:42 -0700
    Re: our twin star benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-15 19:22 -0400
    Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 17:19 -0700

csiph-web