Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #636505
| Message-ID | <5942AFF8.3999@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-15 09:04 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, rec.arts.sf.written, alt.astronomy |
| Subject | our twin star |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
a new study reports that almost all sun-like stars are likely born with companions https://www.space.com/37186-sun-long-lost-twin-nemesis.html https://www.sciencealert.com/all-stars-might-be-born-with-a-twin-and-we-ve-called-ours-nemesis Now, let me explain it all for yous... You can look at the big dipper or little dipper and see the twin stars...and one of the twins...died. Twin stars have a pipeline that transfer energy to each other. If the star drifts away...the pipeline is broken, and the star begins to die. Twin stars are one positive and one negative. Now, what hasn't been discovered yet (i'm waiting for a thousand years for you people to catch up with my genuies) what hasn't been discovered yet ...is every single person is a twin molded into one person. That means, stars not also drift away, but they also meld into one. So, those stupid people looking for our twin star ...some where else... need to look a little closer at our sun and they will find the twin. (i give them another thousand years to find that out) The Starmaker
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 09:04 -0700
Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-15 09:16 -0700
Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 09:26 -0700
Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-15 09:31 -0700
Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-17 14:38 +0200
Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-17 11:51 -0700
Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-17 22:34 +0200
Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-17 17:46 -0700
Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-17 10:20 -0700
Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-17 10:30 -0700
Re: our twin star "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2017-06-15 14:57 -0400
Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 12:15 -0700
Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 12:27 -0700
Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 14:19 -0700
Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 13:40 -0700
Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 14:14 -0700
Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 14:30 -0700
Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 15:43 -0700
Re: our twin star benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-15 19:24 -0400
Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 18:20 -0700
Re: our twin star benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-15 22:38 -0400
Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-16 16:18 -0700
Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 20:24 -0700
Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 17:04 -0700
Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-16 10:45 -0700
Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-16 11:07 -0700
Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-15 20:38 +0200
Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 12:27 -0700
Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-15 22:44 +0200
Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 15:42 -0700
Re: our twin star benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-15 19:22 -0400
Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 17:19 -0700
csiph-web