Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #636533
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, rec.arts.sf.written, alt.astronomy |
| Subject | Re: our twin star |
| Date | 2017-06-15 14:57 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <ohul72$hbv$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <5942AFF8.3999@ix.netcom.com> <deWdnfTX4utHL9_EnZ2dnUU7-VfNnZ2d@giganews.com> <5942B53B.3CF0@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
The Starmaker wrote: > Hägar wrote: >> >> "The Starmaker" wrote in message news:5942AFF8.3999@ix.netcom.com... >> >> a new study reports that almost all sun-like stars are likely born with >> companions >> https://www.space.com/37186-sun-long-lost-twin-nemesis.html >> https://www.sciencealert.com/all-stars-might-be-born-with-a-twin-and-we-ve-called-ours-nemesis >> >> Now, let me explain it all for yous... >> >> You can look at the big dipper or little dipper >> and see the twin stars...and one of the twins...died. >> >> Twin stars have a pipeline that transfer energy to each other. If >> the star drifts away...the pipeline is broken, and the star begins to >> die. >> >> Twin stars are one positive and one negative. >> >> Now, what hasn't been discovered yet (i'm waiting for a thousand years >> for you >> people to catch up with my genuies) >> >> what hasn't been discovered yet ...is >> >> every single person is a twin molded into one person. >> >> That means, stars not also drift away, but they also meld into one. >> >> So, those stupid people looking for our twin star ...some where else... >> need to look a little closer at our sun and they will find the twin. >> >> (i give them another thousand years to find that out) >> >> The Starmaker >> >> ***boy oh boy ... you're right up there with treBert, that other >> manufacturer of putrid brain farts. You two even misspell words >> the same way ... are you by any chance hanging onto delusions >> of a Nobel Prize, like your bro treBert??? > > > > Is there something you disagree with you need to point it out otherwise > you have not a leg to stand on. > > > (but i don't subscribe to drive by shootings as yourself) Aww God Damn it. Quit making me continually agree with Hagar. This is starting to piss me off. You really are a nutcase to even dare post the drivel you did. And if you want another opinion,....you probably smell bad too. BTW What is your position on Democrat Bernie Sanders Supporters shooting republican politicians who were playing baseball ? And then hundreds of anti-trumper people on the net calling the shooter a HERO ? Widespread brainwashing, or just mental illness ?
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 09:04 -0700
Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-15 09:16 -0700
Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 09:26 -0700
Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-15 09:31 -0700
Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-17 14:38 +0200
Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-17 11:51 -0700
Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-17 22:34 +0200
Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-17 17:46 -0700
Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-17 10:20 -0700
Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-17 10:30 -0700
Re: our twin star "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2017-06-15 14:57 -0400
Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 12:15 -0700
Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 12:27 -0700
Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 14:19 -0700
Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 13:40 -0700
Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 14:14 -0700
Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 14:30 -0700
Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 15:43 -0700
Re: our twin star benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-15 19:24 -0400
Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 18:20 -0700
Re: our twin star benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-15 22:38 -0400
Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-16 16:18 -0700
Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 20:24 -0700
Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 17:04 -0700
Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-16 10:45 -0700
Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-16 11:07 -0700
Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-15 20:38 +0200
Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 12:27 -0700
Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-15 22:44 +0200
Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 15:42 -0700
Re: our twin star benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-15 19:22 -0400
Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 17:19 -0700
csiph-web