Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #636547
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, rec.arts.sf.written, alt.astronomy |
| Subject | Re: our twin star |
| Followup-To | sci.astro |
| Date | 2017-06-15 22:44 +0200 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Message-ID | <5049541.DvuYhMxLoT@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | <5942AFF8.3999@ix.netcom.com> <deWdnfTX4utHL9_EnZ2dnUU7-VfNnZ2d@giganews.com> <10859079.O9o76ZdvQC@PointedEars.de> <5942DF85.3A6A@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Followups directed to: sci.astro
"The Starmaker" amok-crossposted across 4 newsgroups without Followup-To: > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >> Hägar wrote: >> > "The Starmaker" wrote in message news:5942AFF8.3999@ix.netcom.com... >> > >> > a new study reports that almost all sun-like stars are likely born with >> > companions >> > https://www.space.com/37186-sun-long-lost-twin-nemesis.html >> > https://www.sciencealert.com/all-stars-might-be-born-with-a-twin-and-we-ve-called-ours-nemesis >> > >> > >> > Now, let me explain it all for yous... >> > >> > You can look at the big dipper or little dipper >> > and see the twin stars...and one of the twins...died. [â¦] >> >> There are two possibilities for this utter misinterpretion of what you >> have just referred to: >> >> A) You are delusional because you have not taken your pills. >> >> In that case, please take your pills. >> >> B) You have taken some pills, and are now delusional. >> >> In that case, please do not take those pills again. >> >> In any case, please seek professional help, and unplug. TIA. >> [signature] For crying out loud, learn to post. > Is there something you disagree with, .. you need to point it out, > otherwise you also have not a pointed ear to.. stand on. Correction, there are two more possibilities: C) You are a troll. D) You are a complete idiot. There is absolutely *nothing* in the articles that you refer to that suggests that “one of the twins...died”. Or that any other of your idiotic "explanations" holds. Admittedly, in light of (C), (D) is somewhat redundant. F'up2 sci.astro -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 09:04 -0700
Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-15 09:16 -0700
Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 09:26 -0700
Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-15 09:31 -0700
Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-17 14:38 +0200
Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-17 11:51 -0700
Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-17 22:34 +0200
Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-17 17:46 -0700
Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-17 10:20 -0700
Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-17 10:30 -0700
Re: our twin star "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2017-06-15 14:57 -0400
Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 12:15 -0700
Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 12:27 -0700
Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 14:19 -0700
Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 13:40 -0700
Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 14:14 -0700
Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 14:30 -0700
Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 15:43 -0700
Re: our twin star benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-15 19:24 -0400
Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 18:20 -0700
Re: our twin star benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-15 22:38 -0400
Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-16 16:18 -0700
Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 20:24 -0700
Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 17:04 -0700
Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-16 10:45 -0700
Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-16 11:07 -0700
Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-15 20:38 +0200
Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 12:27 -0700
Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-15 22:44 +0200
Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 15:42 -0700
Re: our twin star benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-15 19:22 -0400
Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 17:19 -0700
csiph-web