Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #544089

Re: number 28

Path csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date Sat, 09 Jan 2016 15:26:23 -0600
Message-ID <56917B0E.3BDE@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date Sat, 09 Jan 2016 13:26:38 -0800
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version 1.0
Newsgroups sci.physics, sci.math, alt.2600
Subject Re: number 28
References <5675C906.991@ix.netcom.com> <mn.dcba7dfcebecbd2c.134524@aqui.no.es> <56803F37.1C4E@ix.netcom.com> <5680403A.6D3E@ix.netcom.com> <569176EC.B9C@ix.netcom.com> <569177A1.2937@ix.netcom.com> <5691785C.8F0@ix.netcom.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Lines 100
X-Usenet-Provider http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host 162.239.141.5
X-Trace sv3-7YsaLCPDITrXgBSqqNjxL002DhbGs03bGg7Lfgcul1akiWpTpI/gyaB+m9//CdEPPiw7/hawGbTRhbv!Nedgf0FrqeG4KqmoBbkr0hsadl+edVcv2JVq1ssxBZwffYlq3rJSMugkJchUdGvAgCFEifamMu9E!O8vmmQYyYw==
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes 4497
X-Received-Bytes 4609
X-Received-Body-CRC 3784802025
Xref csiph.com sci.physics:544089 sci.math:325755

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > =?ISO-8859-15?Q?=A0?= wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.engadget.com/2015/12/18/log-into-most-any-linux-system-by-hitting-backspace-28-times/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > i discovered the number 28
> > > > > > > works on other systems too!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > for example on twitter
> > > > > > > when you get the
> > > > > > > message you used up
> > > > > > > following limit...
> > > > > > > you hit 28
> > > > > > > and you bypass the limit!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Is number 28 a magic number?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yes... 28 December, the equivalent day in Spain and Hispanic America of
> > > > > > the "April Fools' Day" in the english world.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Are you an spanis fool... ???  :-p :-p
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_Fools'_Day#Comparable_prank_days
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.lotterypost.com/lottery-report-card.asp
> > > > >
> > > > >  he installed self-deleting software that rigged the selection of
> > > > > winning numbers in games that use random number generators.
> > > > >
> > > > > Tipton installed what's known as a root kit that allowed him to
> > > > > manipulate the winning numbers. According to court documents, he was one
> > > > > of four people with access to the Hot Lotto "draw room." In 2010 he
> > > > > entered the draw room to update the lottery system for daylight saving
> > > > > time. Prosecutors allege that he manipulated the room's closed-circuit
> > > > > cameras while installing self-destructing software that allowed him to
> > > > > rig Hot Lotto drawings, thereby flipping Hot Lotto's 29 million-to-1
> > > > > odds of winning a jackpot.
> > > >
> > > > it's the software...
> > > >
> > > > https://www.lotterypost.com/tag/computerized_drawings
> > > >
> > > > I didn't know they used compuerized lottery balls..
> > > >
> > > > i thought maybe they used mercury.
> > >
> > > The reason Why
> > > the California Power Ball lottery
> > > is near the billion mark is because
> > > the lottery system is...not random.
> > >
> > > It's...broken..
> > > the random number generator is deterministic.
> > >
> > > Let me go inside there and fix it for you guys...
> > >
> > > I promise not to buy a lottery ticket for myself.
> > >
> > > for _ = 1, 10 do
> > >         print(math.random(100))
> > >         wait(1)
> > > end
> >
> > I'll fix it with this..
> >
> > /
> > function randomInt(min, max) {
> >   return Math.floor(Math.random() * (max - min)) + min;
> > }
> > //
> > function randomIntByModulo(min, max) {
> >   var i = (Math.random() * 32768) >>> 0;
> >   return (i % (min - max)) + min;
> > }
> 
> don't play 69 or 69...
> this script is heavely biased.
> 
> it's meant to be...broken.


I'm willing to share my lottery secrets...since this is being posted to
alt.2600...

all one needs to do to rasie the probibilty for 'certain numbers' to
be spit out, is simply to spill Coca Cola on the add-on card in the
lottery's computer.


Don't use Pepsi or Seven-Up, it has to be the real thing.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-19 13:15 -0800
  Re: number 28 chanB4 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-12-19 17:10 -0600
    Re: number 28 deathby@snu-snu.com (Phillip J. Fry) - 2015-12-20 00:31 +0000
      Re: number 28 chanB4 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-12-19 21:38 -0600
    Re: number 28 FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> - 2015-12-20 08:27 -0500
      Re: number 28 Boris Mohar <borism_void_@sympatico.ca> - 2015-12-20 10:15 -0500
  Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-19 21:43 -0800
    Re: number 28 G. Morgan <sealteam6@osama-is-dead.net> - 2015-12-22 12:36 -0600
      Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-22 10:55 -0800
        Re: number 28 Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 20:21 +0100
          Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-22 12:02 -0800
            Re: number 28 Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 21:11 +0100
          Re: number 28 G. Morgan <graham@grahammorgan.name> - 2016-01-10 18:58 -0600
        Re: number 28 G. Morgan <graham@grahammorgan.name> - 2016-01-10 18:53 -0600
  Re: number 28 Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-12-20 12:02 +0100
    Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-20 11:24 -0800
      Re: number 28 Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-12-20 11:54 -0800
      Re: number 28 Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-12-20 21:32 +0100
        Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-20 14:02 -0800
          Re: number 28 Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-12-20 23:18 +0100
            Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-21 13:49 -0800
              Re: number 28 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-12-21 16:09 -0600
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-22 11:06 -0800
                Re: number 28 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-12-27 18:31 -0600
              Re: number 28 Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 09:49 +0100
      Re: number 28 G. Morgan <graham@grahammorgan.name> - 2016-01-10 19:04 -0600
  Re: number 28   <nisesabe@aqui.no.es> - 2015-12-27 20:10 +0100
    Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-27 11:42 -0800
      Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-27 11:47 -0800
        Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-09 13:09 -0800
          Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-09 13:12 -0800
            Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-09 13:15 -0800
              Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-09 13:26 -0800
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-10 10:23 -0800
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-10 12:14 -0800
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-10 16:28 -0800
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-11 10:21 -0800
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-11 10:37 -0800
                Re: number 28 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-13 10:56 -0800
    Re: number 28 Jens Stuckelberger <Jens_Stuckelberger@nowhere.net> - 2015-12-28 03:10 +0000

csiph-web