Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #403583
| Path | csiph.com!2.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Calculating G |
| Date | Sat, 31 Dec 2016 19:29:46 +1100 |
| Lines | 20 |
| Message-ID | <ecp8jsF2i6rU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <cceae458-46bc-4085-a9f4-d1f658f8a110@googlegroups.com> <c9d7d848-7c72-46c6-bfc5-a42e06c7e7fe@googlegroups.com> <7fa64703-2169-456c-8055-f61465f5201b@googlegroups.com> <o45fh4$1v6d$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ecmv3qFgbs1U1@mid.individual.net> <856d66d4-ed05-4279-a6f8-f5a10a6a1ee1@googlegroups.com> <8421fc05-930f-4398-bf6e-b7db1938db17@googlegroups.com> <d7ee7c50-d023-466b-8704-8fe9f10df966@googlegroups.com> <ecoh33Fs65oU1@mid.individual.net> <5ed3eefc-efcc-4756-8d78-7cc30ef9b9de@googlegroups.com> <econe0FtfjeU1@mid.individual.net> <3db9f70e-139b-41a3-8180-daaac1e36a1a@googlegroups.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net e4p4rDS+5XAPnrWUXLkSAQahH0Fma7f18Rmabt9tqehPoANFLY |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:Bzw5lxSbxtebfedLzfI8QqkuaeE= |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <3db9f70e-139b-41a3-8180-daaac1e36a1a@googlegroups.com> |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:403583 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 31/12/2016 6:15 PM, Peter Riedt wrote: > On Saturday, December 31, 2016 at 11:36:35 AM UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote: >> On 31/12/2016 2:31 PM, Peter Riedt wrote: >> >>> Also I have established that the observed/calculated g and M of the AC stars are incorrect as reported in the literature. >>> >> >> Which literature? Cite. >> >> Sylvia. > > The values I used were from the Internet. I found g for the Alpha Centauris not accurate. No problem as it is irrelevant. > You do realise that the Internet is not peer reviewed? It is also not conventionally referred to as "the literature". You may have found a site that contains some incorrect numbers, that's all. Sylvia.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Calculating G Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-12-29 19:02 -0800
Re: Calculating G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-29 22:22 -0800
Re: Calculating G Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2016-12-30 12:13 +0100
Re: Calculating G Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-30 22:35 +1100
Re: Calculating G Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2016-12-30 13:03 +0100
Re: Calculating G mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-12-30 04:11 -0800
Re: Calculating G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-30 14:32 -0800
Re: Calculating G Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-12-30 15:17 -0800
Re: Calculating G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-30 16:51 -0800
Re: Calculating G Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-31 12:48 +1100
Re: Calculating G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-30 19:31 -0800
Re: Calculating G Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-31 14:36 +1100
Re: Calculating G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-30 23:15 -0800
Re: Calculating G Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-31 19:29 +1100
Re: Calculating G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-31 01:18 -0800
Re: Calculating G Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-31 20:29 +1100
Re: Calculating G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-31 19:06 -0800
Re: Calculating G Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-12-30 21:33 -0800
Re: Calculating G Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-12-30 19:41 -0800
Re: Calculating G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-30 23:17 -0800
csiph-web