Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #403587

Re: Calculating G

From Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Calculating G
Date 2016-12-31 20:29 +1100
Message-ID <ecpc3vF3d5gU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (9 earlier) <5ed3eefc-efcc-4756-8d78-7cc30ef9b9de@googlegroups.com> <econe0FtfjeU1@mid.individual.net> <3db9f70e-139b-41a3-8180-daaac1e36a1a@googlegroups.com> <ecp8jsF2i6rU1@mid.individual.net> <b6a2ec8b-4331-4218-9fe7-68da756eed5a@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 31/12/2016 8:18 PM, Peter Riedt wrote:
> On Saturday, December 31, 2016 at 4:29:51 PM UTC+8, Sylvia Else
> wrote:
>> On 31/12/2016 6:15 PM, Peter Riedt wrote:
>>> On Saturday, December 31, 2016 at 11:36:35 AM UTC+8, Sylvia Else
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 31/12/2016 2:31 PM, Peter Riedt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Also I have established that the observed/calculated g and M
>>>>> of the AC stars are incorrect as reported in the literature.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Which literature? Cite.
>>>>
>>>> Sylvia.
>>>
>>> The values I used were from the Internet. I found g for the Alpha
>>> Centauris not accurate. No problem as it is irrelevant.
>>>
>>
>> You do realise that the Internet is not peer reviewed? It is also
>> not conventionally referred to as "the literature".
>>
>> You may have found a site that contains some incorrect numbers,
>> that's all.
>>
>> Sylvia.
>
> The Internet gives references to the literature. It doesn't pull it
> out of the air. Many elements of stars however are presented as fact
> by consensus experts when in fact they are only assumptions. If the
> values I used for gstar, rstar and Mstar are wrong, do you know more
> correct ones?
>

If you have references, given to you by the Internet, then cite them. 
Otherwise readers have no way to know where you're getting your numbers 
from.

Sylvia.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Calculating G Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-12-29 19:02 -0800
  Re: Calculating G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-29 22:22 -0800
    Re: Calculating G Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2016-12-30 12:13 +0100
      Re: Calculating G Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-30 22:35 +1100
        Re: Calculating G Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2016-12-30 13:03 +0100
          Re: Calculating G mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-12-30 04:11 -0800
        Re: Calculating G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-30 14:32 -0800
          Re: Calculating G Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-12-30 15:17 -0800
            Re: Calculating G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-30 16:51 -0800
              Re: Calculating G Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-31 12:48 +1100
                Re: Calculating G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-30 19:31 -0800
                Re: Calculating G Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-31 14:36 +1100
                Re: Calculating G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-30 23:15 -0800
                Re: Calculating G Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-31 19:29 +1100
                Re: Calculating G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-31 01:18 -0800
                Re: Calculating G Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-31 20:29 +1100
                Re: Calculating G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-31 19:06 -0800
                Re: Calculating G Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-12-30 21:33 -0800
              Re: Calculating G Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-12-30 19:41 -0800
                Re: Calculating G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-30 23:17 -0800

csiph-web