Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #403554

Re: Calculating G

From	Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Calculating G
Date	2016-12-31 12:48 +1100
Message-ID	<ecoh33Fs65oU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(3 earlier) <o45fh4$1v6d$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ecmv3qFgbs1U1@mid.individual.net> <856d66d4-ed05-4279-a6f8-f5a10a6a1ee1@googlegroups.com> <8421fc05-930f-4398-bf6e-b7db1938db17@googlegroups.com> <d7ee7c50-d023-466b-8704-8fe9f10df966@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 31/12/2016 11:51 AM, Peter Riedt wrote:
> On Saturday, December 31, 2016 at 7:17:38 AM UTC+8, Gary Harnagel
> wrote:
>> On Friday, December 30, 2016 at 3:32:20 PM UTC-7, Peter Riedt
>> wrote:
>>>> If no good arguments then ad hom. It may be difficult but try
>>>> to be
>>> professional.
>>
>> Your error has been explained to you, yet you persist with this
>> stupidity. What do you expect others to say when you act like you
>> misplaced your logic chip?
>
> You persist in ad hom. What is your agenda? I persist in using G to
> confirm relationships between elements of free fall objects in the
> solar system

It's far from clear what you actually think you're achieving. Unless 
you're using a telescope to check the positions of the planets, all 
you're doing is checking that the predicted orbits of the planets are 
the same as the predicted orbits. Well, of course they are.

If a planet deviated from its predicted path, that would soon be 
noticed, but by people who look at them, not by you.

> and to establish if G is the same in other star systems
> and the solar system.
>

Which you won't be able to do by means of circular analyses.

Sylvia.

Thread

Re: Calculating G Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-12-29 19:02 -0800
  Re: Calculating G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-29 22:22 -0800
    Re: Calculating G Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2016-12-30 12:13 +0100
      Re: Calculating G Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-30 22:35 +1100
        Re: Calculating G Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2016-12-30 13:03 +0100
          Re: Calculating G mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-12-30 04:11 -0800
        Re: Calculating G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-30 14:32 -0800
          Re: Calculating G Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-12-30 15:17 -0800
            Re: Calculating G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-30 16:51 -0800
              Re: Calculating G Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-31 12:48 +1100
                Re: Calculating G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-30 19:31 -0800
                Re: Calculating G Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-31 14:36 +1100
                Re: Calculating G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-30 23:15 -0800
                Re: Calculating G Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-31 19:29 +1100
                Re: Calculating G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-31 01:18 -0800
                Re: Calculating G Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-31 20:29 +1100
                Re: Calculating G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-31 19:06 -0800
                Re: Calculating G Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-12-30 21:33 -0800
              Re: Calculating G Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-12-30 19:41 -0800
                Re: Calculating G Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-12-30 23:17 -0800

csiph-web