Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #372775

Re: Particles and Theory

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Particles and Theory
Date Sat, 26 Dec 2015 03:50:07 +0100
Lines 63
Message-ID <de6dj3FmsgbU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <slrnmvb2bl.1pl.nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> <9c739e30-59f6-4e3e-a210-610f96de0c69@googlegroups.com> <slrnmvc3o0.lqd.nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> <361247a0-3c77-4e2a-aa07-3d6f520cfa65@googlegroups.com> <slrnmvep8m.shg.nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> <adc86aca-774c-4a21-9192-7bffbe509f2e@googlegroups.com> <slrnmvgudl.vgr.nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> <5f0bfe92-dd1a-44b7-9882-c0f882321a56@googlegroups.com> <slrnmvk2dc.e3p.nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> <g86lvahndulfs646ra2b4fpqvhvvlihssm@4ax.com> <107f1575-f26e-4b0f-a5f5-0eddcc044daa@googlegroups.com> <slrnmvprt1.v0g.nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> <de4dp7F7o0sU1@mid.individual.net> <slrnn7qb95.1lt.nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> <de5k94Fh3piU1@mid.individual.net> <slrnn7rus5.nd9.nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace individual.net Kpqjzga+tXRxoG2ALKkO4waRO8I8hhFSuZxdZlbvoVyLo23tdP
Cancel-Lock sha1:a3iBezee7/MMAt8do4CgCH4IV28=
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
In-Reply-To <slrnn7rus5.nd9.nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz>
Xref csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:372775

Show key headers only | View raw


Am 26.12.2015 03:29, schrieb Ned Latham:

>> The text is actually a google.doc. This specific format I had
>> used for some strange reasons.
>>
>> Such presentations behave somehow similar to usual webpages
>> and that's why I have chosen this format.
>
> It's cewtainly web-oriented. The PDF insists of being a landscape
> presentation. Still, for me that's good: the font is coming out
> quite legibly large.


It IS a landscape presentation (technically).

It is a special feature of this particular format to behave somehow 
similar to webspace. Other google.docs cannot be used for this purpose.

>>                                            It is actually
>> extremely annoying to write something in this format. But
>> google.doc.presentations are free and a that time had no
>> money (and lost all my domains).
>
> I handwrite my work in HTML because of its cross-referencing power.
> The only downside (IMO) is the lack of a tag for defining pages.
> But maybe HTML 5 will cure that: I've just started reading a manual
> on it.
>
>> The text would certainly deserve some 'maintenance', but I see no
>> compelling reason to do that.
>
> You don't believe in it any more?


I have the habit to change the focus of my interests from time to time.

E.g. once I was interested in Chemistry. Later I made a lot of photos 
and had a darkroom and a few exhibitions.

I can also paint quite well. And three little stories of me got published.

Now I spent my free time with electronics, repair of various technical 
stuff (like watches or cameras) and 'conspiracy theories'.

But occasionally I try to bring my 'book' into attention, since - after 
all- it was a lot of work.

But you cannot maintain the ability to do such work for a long time, if 
there is no feedback.

So I decided to do things more directly useful, like renovation of my 
flat, sorting papers and invention of new recipes for pizza.

>> I have spent some years with this 'book'. But after I failed to
>> find readers, I have closed this project and do other stuff now.
>
> My ISP gives each user account 50 MB of space to use as a web page.
> Can you get a deal like that where you are?

Yes, actually not a problem to find cheap webspace. But at the time I 
had written that book, I went broke with my bar and had no money at all.

TH

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Particles and Theory Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-25 09:41 +0100
  Re: Particles and Theory Ned Latham <nedlatham@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-25 05:48 -0600
    Re: Particles and Theory Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-25 20:38 +0100
      Re: Particles and Theory Ned Latham <nedlatham@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-25 20:29 -0600
        Re: Particles and Theory Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-26 03:50 +0100
      Re: Particles and Theory Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-26 03:31 +0100

csiph-web