Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #372775
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Particles and Theory |
| Date | 2015-12-26 03:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <de6dj3FmsgbU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (11 earlier) <slrnmvprt1.v0g.nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> <de4dp7F7o0sU1@mid.individual.net> <slrnn7qb95.1lt.nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> <de5k94Fh3piU1@mid.individual.net> <slrnn7rus5.nd9.nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> |
Am 26.12.2015 03:29, schrieb Ned Latham: >> The text is actually a google.doc. This specific format I had >> used for some strange reasons. >> >> Such presentations behave somehow similar to usual webpages >> and that's why I have chosen this format. > > It's cewtainly web-oriented. The PDF insists of being a landscape > presentation. Still, for me that's good: the font is coming out > quite legibly large. It IS a landscape presentation (technically). It is a special feature of this particular format to behave somehow similar to webspace. Other google.docs cannot be used for this purpose. >> It is actually >> extremely annoying to write something in this format. But >> google.doc.presentations are free and a that time had no >> money (and lost all my domains). > > I handwrite my work in HTML because of its cross-referencing power. > The only downside (IMO) is the lack of a tag for defining pages. > But maybe HTML 5 will cure that: I've just started reading a manual > on it. > >> The text would certainly deserve some 'maintenance', but I see no >> compelling reason to do that. > > You don't believe in it any more? I have the habit to change the focus of my interests from time to time. E.g. once I was interested in Chemistry. Later I made a lot of photos and had a darkroom and a few exhibitions. I can also paint quite well. And three little stories of me got published. Now I spent my free time with electronics, repair of various technical stuff (like watches or cameras) and 'conspiracy theories'. But occasionally I try to bring my 'book' into attention, since - after all- it was a lot of work. But you cannot maintain the ability to do such work for a long time, if there is no feedback. So I decided to do things more directly useful, like renovation of my flat, sorting papers and invention of new recipes for pizza. >> I have spent some years with this 'book'. But after I failed to >> find readers, I have closed this project and do other stuff now. > > My ISP gives each user account 50 MB of space to use as a web page. > Can you get a deal like that where you are? Yes, actually not a problem to find cheap webspace. But at the time I had written that book, I went broke with my bar and had no money at all. TH
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Particles and Theory Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-25 09:41 +0100
Re: Particles and Theory Ned Latham <nedlatham@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-25 05:48 -0600
Re: Particles and Theory Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-25 20:38 +0100
Re: Particles and Theory Ned Latham <nedlatham@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-25 20:29 -0600
Re: Particles and Theory Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-26 03:50 +0100
Re: Particles and Theory Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-26 03:31 +0100
csiph-web