Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #372759

Re: Particles and Theory

Show all headers | View raw

Am 25.12.2015 12:48, schrieb Ned Latham:

>>> ----snip----
>>>
>>>> The vacuum of Space time itself is the oscillator.
>>>
>>> And try to avoid using unsubstantiated hypotheses as fact.
>>
>> Apparently you demand a proof for such a hypothesis.
>
> No. In my lexicon, hypotheses and theories are called that because
> they're unproven, and the difference between them is simply that a
> theory is a testable hypothesis. I don't demand proof, just evidence.
>
> I regard the space-time postulate as a hypothesis which I cannot
> assess as either testable or untestable, so I'm forced to fall
> back on assessing the plausibility of the notion. And I see none.
> AFAIC, it's nonsense, and that opinion is reinforced by the lack
> of any credible evidence in its favour.
>
> In fact, in the Particle Theory of Matter, I have stated one of
> the problems of "current theory" as being that it "postulates
> the noumenon Time as a phenomenon, an aspect and dimension of
> the postulated space-time continuum".
>
> Fuller treats the unsubstantiated hypothesis (postulate) as
> an established fact. It ain't. To say that it oscillates is
> to do no more than embellish the nonsense.
>
>> To prove something is difficult in physics. But I like to
>> assist by providing a more elaborate version:
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dd8jz2tx_3gfzvqgd6
>
> Very interesting, Thomas. Is there any way I can download it
> as a single file?


Yes. There is a little arrow at the bottom of the page, labelled 'actions'.

One of those is 'download as pdf'. This will do what you want.


The text is actually a google.doc. This specific format I had used for 
some strange reasons.

Such presentations behave somehow similar to usual webpages and that's 
why I have chosen this format. It is actually extremely annoying to 
write something in this format. But google.doc.presentations are free 
and a that time had no money (and lost all my domains).

The text would certainly deserve some 'maintenance', but I see no 
compelling reason to do that.

I have spent some years with this 'book'. But after I failed to find 
readers, I have closed this project and do other stuff now.


TH

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Particles and Theory Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-25 09:41 +0100
  Re: Particles and Theory Ned Latham <nedlatham@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-25 05:48 -0600
    Re: Particles and Theory Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-25 20:38 +0100
      Re: Particles and Theory Ned Latham <nedlatham@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-25 20:29 -0600
        Re: Particles and Theory Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-26 03:50 +0100
      Re: Particles and Theory Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-26 03:31 +0100

csiph-web