Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #372773

Re: Particles and Theory

Show all headers | View raw

Am 25.12.2015 20:38, schrieb Thomas Heger:

>>>> ----snip----
>>>>
>>>>> The vacuum of Space time itself is the oscillator.
>>>>
>>>> And try to avoid using unsubstantiated hypotheses as fact.
>>>
>>> Apparently you demand a proof for such a hypothesis.
>>
>> No. In my lexicon, hypotheses and theories are called that because
>> they're unproven, and the difference between them is simply that a
>> theory is a testable hypothesis. I don't demand proof, just evidence.
>>
>> I regard the space-time postulate as a hypothesis which I cannot
>> assess as either testable or untestable, so I'm forced to fall
>> back on assessing the plausibility of the notion. And I see none.
>> AFAIC, it's nonsense, and that opinion is reinforced by the lack
>> of any credible evidence in its favour.
>>
>> In fact, in the Particle Theory of Matter, I have stated one of
>> the problems of "current theory" as being that it "postulates
>> the noumenon Time as a phenomenon, an aspect and dimension of
>> the postulated space-time continuum".
>>
>> Fuller treats the unsubstantiated hypothesis (postulate) as
>> an established fact. It ain't. To say that it oscillates is
>> to do no more than embellish the nonsense.
>>
>>> To prove something is difficult in physics. But I like to
>>> assist by providing a more elaborate version:
>>>
>>> https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dd8jz2tx_3gfzvqgd6
>>
>> Very interesting, Thomas. Is there any way I can download it
>> as a single file?
>
>
> Yes. There is a little arrow at the bottom of the page, labelled 'actions'.
>
> One of those is 'download as pdf'. This will do what you want.
>

Google has changed the design a little bit and now the button looks like 
a tiny flower and is labelled 'options'.

There you find the possibility to download the entire 'book'.

It's not really a book, but a presentation similar to powerpoint.

It's inital purpose was, that I wanted to store such postings to the 
UseNet (like e.g. this one)  into a file, that was possible to access 
from the Internet.

So at the beginning every page contained something different. Than I 
shuffled them around into a new order, shortened everything a bit and 
wrote several new pages, to make the thing look more like a book.

Then I made all these illustrations, which are an important part of the 
text.

Finally I formatted everything as carefully as possible (what is 
difficult with google.docs).

But (to my surprise) there seemed to be no demand for what I had written.

TH

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Particles and Theory Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-25 09:41 +0100
  Re: Particles and Theory Ned Latham <nedlatham@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-25 05:48 -0600
    Re: Particles and Theory Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-25 20:38 +0100
      Re: Particles and Theory Ned Latham <nedlatham@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-25 20:29 -0600
        Re: Particles and Theory Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-26 03:50 +0100
      Re: Particles and Theory Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-26 03:31 +0100

csiph-web