Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #372773
Show key headers only | View raw
Am 25.12.2015 20:38, schrieb Thomas Heger: >>>> ----snip---- >>>> >>>>> The vacuum of Space time itself is the oscillator. >>>> >>>> And try to avoid using unsubstantiated hypotheses as fact. >>> >>> Apparently you demand a proof for such a hypothesis. >> >> No. In my lexicon, hypotheses and theories are called that because >> they're unproven, and the difference between them is simply that a >> theory is a testable hypothesis. I don't demand proof, just evidence. >> >> I regard the space-time postulate as a hypothesis which I cannot >> assess as either testable or untestable, so I'm forced to fall >> back on assessing the plausibility of the notion. And I see none. >> AFAIC, it's nonsense, and that opinion is reinforced by the lack >> of any credible evidence in its favour. >> >> In fact, in the Particle Theory of Matter, I have stated one of >> the problems of "current theory" as being that it "postulates >> the noumenon Time as a phenomenon, an aspect and dimension of >> the postulated space-time continuum". >> >> Fuller treats the unsubstantiated hypothesis (postulate) as >> an established fact. It ain't. To say that it oscillates is >> to do no more than embellish the nonsense. >> >>> To prove something is difficult in physics. But I like to >>> assist by providing a more elaborate version: >>> >>> https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dd8jz2tx_3gfzvqgd6 >> >> Very interesting, Thomas. Is there any way I can download it >> as a single file? > > > Yes. There is a little arrow at the bottom of the page, labelled 'actions'. > > One of those is 'download as pdf'. This will do what you want. > Google has changed the design a little bit and now the button looks like a tiny flower and is labelled 'options'. There you find the possibility to download the entire 'book'. It's not really a book, but a presentation similar to powerpoint. It's inital purpose was, that I wanted to store such postings to the UseNet (like e.g. this one) into a file, that was possible to access from the Internet. So at the beginning every page contained something different. Than I shuffled them around into a new order, shortened everything a bit and wrote several new pages, to make the thing look more like a book. Then I made all these illustrations, which are an important part of the text. Finally I formatted everything as carefully as possible (what is difficult with google.docs). But (to my surprise) there seemed to be no demand for what I had written. TH
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Particles and Theory Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-25 09:41 +0100
Re: Particles and Theory Ned Latham <nedlatham@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-25 05:48 -0600
Re: Particles and Theory Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-25 20:38 +0100
Re: Particles and Theory Ned Latham <nedlatham@internode.on.net> - 2015-12-25 20:29 -0600
Re: Particles and Theory Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-26 03:50 +0100
Re: Particles and Theory Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-26 03:31 +0100
csiph-web