Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #509065

Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 23/07/2015 11:49 PM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
> "Sylvia Else" <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote in message
> news:d1bglqF50fuU1@mid.individual.net...
>
>> The OP seems to have abandoned this thread. It's probably too much to
>> hope that this is because he's finally grasped the truth, being that
>> there's no paradox.
>
> You wish.  This discussion has rather confirmed that there is a problem
> with relativity rooted into special relativity already.  But I keep
> monitoring the thread, just nothing new is coming up: e.g. that you are
> only contributing fallacies has been pointed out already (you
> incompetent troll).
>
> BTW, my idea so far is not that relativity is inconsistent, in fact I
> still have found no evidence for that, but relativity, at least the
> common picture we are given of it, is certainly incomplete: the
> paradoxes rather call for something more fundamental than space-time,
> and that is or has to do with conscience and causality.  Well, that is
> the line of research anyway...
>
> No worries, I'll keep you posted.
>
> Julio
>
>

We're still waiting for your math.

Sylvia.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox "Julio Di Egidio" <julio@diegidio.name> - 2015-07-23 14:49 +0100
  Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-07-24 11:44 +1000
  Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-07-23 22:00 -0500

csiph-web