Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #396541

Re: Two Trillion Galaxies,

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > William December Starr wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > In article <vogf0cdkq80ibh567rcbhd0javjs1i4o9b@4ax.com>,
> > > > > SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> said:
> > > > >
> > > > > > The unverse obviously has no limits. It doesn't take much sense to
> > > > > > realize this. If this is a supposed bondary, then what's that over
> > > > > > there on the other side ?!
> > > > >
> > > > > A really loud party.
> > > > >
> > > > > > So there's probably no limit at all to the number of galaxies.
> > > > > > Trillions ? Sure why not ? And probably much more or infinite !
> > > > >
> > > > > It'd be limited by how many stars can be built from the finite
> > > > > and unchanging (I believe) amount of mass-energy in the universe,
> > > > > wouldn't it?
> > > > >
> > > > > -- wds
> > > >
> > > > Before the big bang there were no galaxies
> > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > >
> > > > all the stars (green stars)
> > > > got too overcrowded
> > > > and that caused the
> > > > universe to get too hot..
> > > > and it exploded.
> > > >
> > > > Galaxies were formed to
> > > > prevent stars from gettin
> > > > too over crowded.
> > > >
> > > > This is what the universe looked like
> > > > moments before and after the big bang
> > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> > > >
> > > > The red stars formed the new galaxies..
> > > > the new universe...
> > > > at least that's what Nature intended.
> > > >
> > > > It fixed it.
> > > >
> > > > Any questions?
> > >
> > > I don't understand why the 'scientific community' has not
> > > announced what caused the big bang? I know what caused it.
> > > How could I be the only one??
> > > I know I'm a fuckin genuis but this is gone too far.
> > > You guys are taking too long to catch up.
> > >
> > > Before the big bang there was a limit amount of space in
> > > which stars can be born, as there is a limit amount of space today.
> > >
> > > Before the big bang...
> > > the universe got so crowded with stars that all it
> > > took is for one more baby star to set off a big bang.
> > >
> > > Today the universe might be bigger than it was before the big bang..
> > > but it is still has a bottom, a side, a top..and everything it in.
> > >
> > > How big is the ocean to a guppie?
> > >
> > > Even the stupid little fish knows the ocean has a bottom.
> >
> > Now, why do fishes eat other fishes?
> >
> > If you do a search for the answer you'll find stupid answers like Nature made them that way, or they like fish food.
> >
> > But the answer they don't give is....the big bang made them that way.
> >
> > In the big bang ...process, it made sure there isn't a over population of...Stars.
> >
> > Otherwise, there would be a big bang in the ocean...
> 
> The problem is is 'these peope' ask The Wrong Questions.
> 
> The wrong question they ask is..."What caused the Big Bang?"
> 
> The Right question is..."WHY did the Big Bang happen?"
> 
> Once you know Why, then what difference does What caused it?????



...as someone once said...."...the rest are just details."

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-17 11:02 -0700
  Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-17 21:25 -0700
  Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-18 09:10 -0700
    Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 10:42 -0700
      Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> - 2016-10-19 15:07 -0400
        Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-10-21 08:30 -0400
          Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-21 16:59 +0100
          Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-21 11:07 -0700
            Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-22 12:07 -0700
              Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-22 22:59 -0700
                Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-23 11:32 -0700
                Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-23 12:22 -0700
          Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> - 2016-10-22 09:03 -0400
            Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Dwain Foster <dwainbwe@tyrellysite.org> - 2016-10-22 13:44 +0000
      Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SPQR <SPQR@SPQR.org> - 2016-10-19 13:36 -0600
        Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 13:19 -0700
          Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 14:35 -0700
            Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SPQR <SPQR@SPQR.org> - 2016-10-19 16:52 -0600
              Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 16:15 -0700
      Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-10-19 16:31 -0700
        Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 17:30 -0700
        Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-19 20:16 -0400
      Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Robert Bannister <robban@clubtelco.com> - 2016-10-20 10:02 +0800
  Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, alsor@interia.pl - 2016-10-18 10:56 -0700
  Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-22 06:42 +0200

csiph-web