Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #396445
| Message-ID | <580BB904.2EF5@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-22 12:07 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy, sci.math |
| Subject | Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, |
| References | (1 earlier) <2e5bda71-c0c9-4d54-9e92-f100079f8ee8@googlegroups.com> <5807B06D.66CC@ix.netcom.com> <vogf0cdkq80ibh567rcbhd0javjs1i4o9b@4ax.com> <nud1op$f8a$1@panix3.panix.com> <580A5965.7CF@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
The Starmaker wrote: > > William December Starr wrote: > > > > In article <vogf0cdkq80ibh567rcbhd0javjs1i4o9b@4ax.com>, > > SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> said: > > > > > The unverse obviously has no limits. It doesn't take much sense to > > > realize this. If this is a supposed bondary, then what's that over > > > there on the other side ?! > > > > A really loud party. > > > > > So there's probably no limit at all to the number of galaxies. > > > Trillions ? Sure why not ? And probably much more or infinite ! > > > > It'd be limited by how many stars can be built from the finite > > and unchanging (I believe) amount of mass-energy in the universe, > > wouldn't it? > > > > -- wds > > Before the big bang there were no galaxies > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > all the stars (green stars) > got too overcrowded > and that caused the > universe to get too hot.. > and it exploded. > > Galaxies were formed to > prevent stars from gettin > too over crowded. > > This is what the universe looked like > moments before and after the big bang > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > The red stars formed the new galaxies.. > the new universe... > at least that's what Nature intended. > > It fixed it. > > Any questions? I don't understand why the 'scientific community' has not announced what caused the big bang? I know what caused it. How could I be the only one?? I know I'm a fuckin genuis but this is gone too far. You guys are taking too long to catch up. Before the big bang there was a limit amount of space in which stars can be born, as there is a limit amount of space today. Before the big bang... the universe got so crowded with stars that all it took is for one more baby star to set off a big bang. Today the universe might be bigger than it was before the big bang.. but it is still has a bottom, a side, a top..and everything it in. How big is the ocean to a guppie? Even the stupid little fish knows the ocean has a bottom. ...and for you math girls...Albert Einstein once said: "...mathematics, a product of human thought.." not a discovery.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-17 11:02 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-17 21:25 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-18 09:10 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 10:42 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> - 2016-10-19 15:07 -0400
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-10-21 08:30 -0400
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-21 16:59 +0100
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-21 11:07 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-22 12:07 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-22 22:59 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-23 11:32 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-23 12:22 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> - 2016-10-22 09:03 -0400
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Dwain Foster <dwainbwe@tyrellysite.org> - 2016-10-22 13:44 +0000
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SPQR <SPQR@SPQR.org> - 2016-10-19 13:36 -0600
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 13:19 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 14:35 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SPQR <SPQR@SPQR.org> - 2016-10-19 16:52 -0600
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 16:15 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-10-19 16:31 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 17:30 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-19 20:16 -0400
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Robert Bannister <robban@clubtelco.com> - 2016-10-20 10:02 +0800
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, alsor@interia.pl - 2016-10-18 10:56 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-22 06:42 +0200
csiph-web