Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > rec.arts.sf.written > #454793

Re: Two Trillion Galaxies,

From wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr)
Newsgroups rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy, sci.math
Subject Re: Two Trillion Galaxies,
Date 2016-10-21 08:30 -0400
Organization PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID <nud1op$f8a$1@panix3.panix.com> (permalink)
References <58051241.369A@ix.netcom.com> <2e5bda71-c0c9-4d54-9e92-f100079f8ee8@googlegroups.com> <5807B06D.66CC@ix.netcom.com> <vogf0cdkq80ibh567rcbhd0javjs1i4o9b@4ax.com>

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

In article <vogf0cdkq80ibh567rcbhd0javjs1i4o9b@4ax.com>,
SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> said:

> The unverse obviously has no limits. It doesn't take much sense to
> realize this. If this is a supposed bondary, then what's that over
> there on the other side ?!

A really loud party.

> So there's probably no limit at all to the number of galaxies.
> Trillions ? Sure why not ? And probably much more or infinite !

It'd be limited by how many stars can be built from the finite
and unchanging (I believe) amount of mass-energy in the universe,
wouldn't it?

-- wds

Back to rec.arts.sf.written | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-17 11:02 -0700
  Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, tsbrueni@gmail.com - 2016-10-17 15:06 -0700
    Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Moriarty <blues95@ivillage.com> - 2016-10-17 15:16 -0700
      Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, TB <tsbrueni@dcn.davis.ca.us> - 2016-10-17 18:33 -0700
        Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Moriarty <blues95@ivillage.com> - 2016-10-17 19:23 -0700
          Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, tsbrueni@gmail.com - 2016-10-18 00:18 -0700
            Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Kevrob <kevrob@my-deja.com> - 2016-10-18 09:06 -0700
              Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, tsbrueni@gmail.com - 2016-10-18 09:46 -0700
            Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Moriarty <blues95@ivillage.com> - 2016-10-18 14:28 -0700
          Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, tsbrueni@gmail.com - 2016-10-18 00:19 -0700
          Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 16:26 -0600
            Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 21:58 -0700
    Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-17 21:25 -0700
      Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, tsbrueni@gmail.com - 2016-10-18 00:20 -0700
  Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-18 09:10 -0700
    Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, TB <tsbrueni@dcn.davis.ca.us> - 2016-10-18 10:29 -0700
      Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 10:42 -0700
        Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> - 2016-10-19 15:07 -0400
          Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-20 10:20 +0100
          Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-10-21 08:30 -0400
            Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Peter Trei <petertrei@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 06:11 -0700
              Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-22 00:29 -0500
                Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Jaimie Vandenbergh <jaimie@sometimes.sessile.org> - 2016-10-22 09:26 +0100
                Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2016-10-24 21:17 +0000
                Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-25 04:15 -0500
                Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Adamastor Glace Mortimer <nospam@no.invalid> - 2016-11-08 01:19 +0000
                Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-11-08 04:25 -0600
            Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-21 16:59 +0100
            Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-21 11:07 -0700
              Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-22 12:07 -0700
                Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-22 22:59 -0700
                Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-23 11:32 -0700
                Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-23 12:22 -0700
            Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> - 2016-10-22 09:03 -0400
        Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SPQR <SPQR@SPQR.org> - 2016-10-19 13:36 -0600
          Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 13:19 -0700
            Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 14:35 -0700
              Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SPQR <SPQR@SPQR.org> - 2016-10-19 16:52 -0600
                Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 16:15 -0700
        Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 17:30 -0700
        Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Robert Bannister <robban@clubtelco.com> - 2016-10-20 10:02 +0800
  Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-22 06:42 +0200

csiph-web