Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 14:21:45 -0500 Message-ID: <580D0E03.4815@ix.netcom.com> Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 12:22:43 -0700 From: The Starmaker Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.astronomy,sci.math Subject: Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, References: <58051241.369A@ix.netcom.com> <2e5bda71-c0c9-4d54-9e92-f100079f8ee8@googlegroups.com> <5807B06D.66CC@ix.netcom.com> <580A5965.7CF@ix.netcom.com> <580BB904.2EF5@ix.netcom.com> <580C51AE.35BF@ix.netcom.com> <580D024A.1D68@ix.netcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 94 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.219.229.47 X-Trace: sv3-i3iLMAKOByS7Bk6uG3fQGPABnIslgPf/4sXYmUgvoACq3yVWVaNoCO7YbA8So3ue3XY9wNQOYZILA2q!QYtMwOqb/RQ29dgVTM2ZAeOKur7hxyvWmKWKQuZz7TJtA1bDtw9lrNX+0V73TLyHAFuoSklPjtUi!iJIRWOv5sgQ= X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 4714 Xref: csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:454995 sci.physics:602194 sci.physics.relativity:396541 alt.astronomy:287012 sci.math:349385 The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > William December Starr wrote: > > > > > > > > > > In article , > > > > > SteveGG said: > > > > > > > > > > > The unverse obviously has no limits. It doesn't take much sense to > > > > > > realize this. If this is a supposed bondary, then what's that over > > > > > > there on the other side ?! > > > > > > > > > > A really loud party. > > > > > > > > > > > So there's probably no limit at all to the number of galaxies. > > > > > > Trillions ? Sure why not ? And probably much more or infinite ! > > > > > > > > > > It'd be limited by how many stars can be built from the finite > > > > > and unchanging (I believe) amount of mass-energy in the universe, > > > > > wouldn't it? > > > > > > > > > > -- wds > > > > > > > > Before the big bang there were no galaxies > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > > > all the stars (green stars) > > > > got too overcrowded > > > > and that caused the > > > > universe to get too hot.. > > > > and it exploded. > > > > > > > > Galaxies were formed to > > > > prevent stars from gettin > > > > too over crowded. > > > > > > > > This is what the universe looked like > > > > moments before and after the big bang > > > > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg > > > > > > > > The red stars formed the new galaxies.. > > > > the new universe... > > > > at least that's what Nature intended. > > > > > > > > It fixed it. > > > > > > > > Any questions? > > > > > > I don't understand why the 'scientific community' has not > > > announced what caused the big bang? I know what caused it. > > > How could I be the only one?? > > > I know I'm a fuckin genuis but this is gone too far. > > > You guys are taking too long to catch up. > > > > > > Before the big bang there was a limit amount of space in > > > which stars can be born, as there is a limit amount of space today. > > > > > > Before the big bang... > > > the universe got so crowded with stars that all it > > > took is for one more baby star to set off a big bang. > > > > > > Today the universe might be bigger than it was before the big bang.. > > > but it is still has a bottom, a side, a top..and everything it in. > > > > > > How big is the ocean to a guppie? > > > > > > Even the stupid little fish knows the ocean has a bottom. > > > > Now, why do fishes eat other fishes? > > > > If you do a search for the answer you'll find stupid answers like Nature made them that way, or they like fish food. > > > > But the answer they don't give is....the big bang made them that way. > > > > In the big bang ...process, it made sure there isn't a over population of...Stars. > > > > Otherwise, there would be a big bang in the ocean... > > The problem is is 'these peope' ask The Wrong Questions. > > The wrong question they ask is..."What caused the Big Bang?" > > The Right question is..."WHY did the Big Bang happen?" > > Once you know Why, then what difference does What caused it????? ...as someone once said...."...the rest are just details."