Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #396501

Re: Two Trillion Galaxies,

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > William December Starr wrote:
> > >
> > > In article <vogf0cdkq80ibh567rcbhd0javjs1i4o9b@4ax.com>,
> > > SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> said:
> > >
> > > > The unverse obviously has no limits. It doesn't take much sense to
> > > > realize this. If this is a supposed bondary, then what's that over
> > > > there on the other side ?!
> > >
> > > A really loud party.
> > >
> > > > So there's probably no limit at all to the number of galaxies.
> > > > Trillions ? Sure why not ? And probably much more or infinite !
> > >
> > > It'd be limited by how many stars can be built from the finite
> > > and unchanging (I believe) amount of mass-energy in the universe,
> > > wouldn't it?
> > >
> > > -- wds
> >
> > Before the big bang there were no galaxies
> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> >
> > all the stars (green stars)
> > got too overcrowded
> > and that caused the
> > universe to get too hot..
> > and it exploded.
> >
> > Galaxies were formed to
> > prevent stars from gettin
> > too over crowded.
> >
> > This is what the universe looked like
> > moments before and after the big bang
> > http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg
> >
> > The red stars formed the new galaxies..
> > the new universe...
> > at least that's what Nature intended.
> >
> > It fixed it.
> >
> > Any questions?
> 
> I don't understand why the 'scientific community' has not
> announced what caused the big bang? I know what caused it.
> How could I be the only one??
> I know I'm a fuckin genuis but this is gone too far.
> You guys are taking too long to catch up.
> 
> Before the big bang there was a limit amount of space in
> which stars can be born, as there is a limit amount of space today.
> 
> Before the big bang...
> the universe got so crowded with stars that all it
> took is for one more baby star to set off a big bang.
> 
> Today the universe might be bigger than it was before the big bang..
> but it is still has a bottom, a side, a top..and everything it in.
> 
> How big is the ocean to a guppie?
> 
> Even the stupid little fish knows the ocean has a bottom.


Now, why do fishes eat other fishes?



If you do a search for the answer you'll find stupid answers like Nature made them that way, or they like fish food.


But the answer they don't give is....the big bang made them that way.


In the big bang ...process, it made sure there isn't a over population of...Stars.


Otherwise, there would be a big bang in the ocean...

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-17 11:02 -0700
  Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-17 21:25 -0700
  Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-18 09:10 -0700
    Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 10:42 -0700
      Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> - 2016-10-19 15:07 -0400
        Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-10-21 08:30 -0400
          Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-21 16:59 +0100
          Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-21 11:07 -0700
            Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-22 12:07 -0700
              Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-22 22:59 -0700
                Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-23 11:32 -0700
                Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-23 12:22 -0700
          Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> - 2016-10-22 09:03 -0400
            Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Dwain Foster <dwainbwe@tyrellysite.org> - 2016-10-22 13:44 +0000
      Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SPQR <SPQR@SPQR.org> - 2016-10-19 13:36 -0600
        Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 13:19 -0700
          Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 14:35 -0700
            Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SPQR <SPQR@SPQR.org> - 2016-10-19 16:52 -0600
              Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 16:15 -0700
      Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-10-19 16:31 -0700
        Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 17:30 -0700
        Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-19 20:16 -0400
      Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Robert Bannister <robban@clubtelco.com> - 2016-10-20 10:02 +0800
  Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, alsor@interia.pl - 2016-10-18 10:56 -0700
  Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-22 06:42 +0200

csiph-web