Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #390386

Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical.

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Gary Harnagel wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 at 5:24:52 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Gary Harnagel wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 at 11:31:00 AM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tom Roberts wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." --
> > > > > > > Arthur C. Clarke.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I looked at your "sufficiently advanced technology", ...I opened up the
> > > > > > IBM PC, looked inside...and there was no magic. It's junk now.
> > > > >
> > > > > So to see ahead of you, you look at your butt?
> > >
> > > No comment from the butt-watcher :-)
> > >
> > > > > > All "sufficiently advanced technology" becomes just junk.
> > > > >
> > > > > Of course, weirdo, but that's not what Clarke was talking about.  Are you
> > > > > really do ignorant?
> > > > >
> > > > > > But, but..if you're talking about "sufficiently advanced technology"
> > > > > > created by aliens from outer space...sorry, i don't read science fiction
> > > > > > books.
> > > > >
> > > > > Then you are the poorer for it:
> > > >
> > > > "Lest it distort pure science and give people the false illusion of
> > > > scientific understanding, he recommended complete abstinence from
> > > >  any type of science fiction." -Albert Einstein
> > >
> > > Okay for him, but not for you and me.  You have already distorted science
> > > in your head.
> >
> >  “I have no reason to believe that there is something real behind the stories of the 'Flying Saucers.'” Source: Einstein Archives
> 
> Now, Einstein said:
> 
> “I have no reason to believe that there is something real behind the stories of the 'Flying Saucers.'”
> 
> The difference between Einstein ...then, and all of the 'scientifci community' TODAY...is that,
> 
> Einstein knew what "something real" is.
> 
> Today, there is not a single member of the 'scientific community' that understads what "something real" is.
> 
> If anyone today says "There is a 'chance' that aliens from another planet in flying vechicles exist somewhere out there." Are
> simply not being Real. Have no idea what Real is.
> 
> The 'scientific community' have lost the meaning, (or never learned it) on what is real and what is not real.
> 
> Maybe they read too many science fiction books or something...

In otherwords..

Can you name anyone in the 'scientific community' that will say,
“I have no reason to believe that there is something real behind the stories of the 'Flying Saucers.'”
?


You cannot, because...there is no one out there that is in touch with reality, they don't know what 'real' is.


Maybe they read too many science fiction books or something...


The only conclusion I can come up with is...they are stupid. They forgot to take a 'reality' course in skool.



Isn't there any professors that can tell their students..."There are no FUCKIN FLYING SAUCERS!" ?



Or, just keep them stupid...


On the other hand...if you tell people "There is no Life on Mars." how are they going to make money??


How are you going to sell NASA and science fiction books???

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-12 10:04 -0500
  Re: "Virtual Reality" is a _model_ of reality; even when it's poorly done. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-12 18:56 -0500
  Re: Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-14 20:42 -0400
    Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 08:47 -0500
      Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-15 18:01 -0400
        Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-16 08:45 -0500
          Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-16 10:31 -0700
            Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-16 14:34 -0700
              Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-16 16:25 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-16 18:47 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-17 13:35 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-17 13:37 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-17 17:52 -0400
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-08-18 13:23 -0400
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 10:25 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-18 22:17 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-19 11:04 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-20 15:18 -0700
              Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-18 20:09 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-18 20:17 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-18 20:29 -0700
        Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 17:34 -0500
          Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-18 20:49 -0400
            Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-18 20:25 -0500
              Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-18 23:22 -0400
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-19 10:10 -0500
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-19 08:35 -0700
      Re: Reduce your meds. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-17 11:02 -0500

csiph-web