Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #390206
| Message-ID | <57B4CA7C.5A34@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-17 13:35 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, rec.arts.sf.written |
| Subject | Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. |
| References | (11 earlier) <L6adnfd3M9JohS7KnZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com> <57B34DE8.6606@ix.netcom.com> <e580daf6-793a-4b6b-aa6c-3a484a8526bc@googlegroups.com> <57B3A0E6.5503@ix.netcom.com> <96be3af3-b6c2-4af3-b013-4d62e93c7f79@googlegroups.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Gary Harnagel wrote: > > On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 at 5:24:52 PM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Gary Harnagel wrote: > > > > > > On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 at 11:31:00 AM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > Tom Roberts wrote: > > > > > > > > > > "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." -- > > > > > Arthur C. Clarke. > > > > > > > > > > > > I looked at your "sufficiently advanced technology", ...I opened up the > > > > IBM PC, looked inside...and there was no magic. It's junk now. > > > > > > So to see ahead of you, you look at your butt? > > No comment from the butt-watcher :-) > > > > > All "sufficiently advanced technology" becomes just junk. > > > > > > Of course, weirdo, but that's not what Clarke was talking about. Are you > > > really do ignorant? > > > > > > > But, but..if you're talking about "sufficiently advanced technology" > > > > created by aliens from outer space...sorry, i don't read science fiction > > > > books. > > > > > > Then you are the poorer for it: > > > > "Lest it distort pure science and give people the false illusion of > > scientific understanding, he recommended complete abstinence from > > any type of science fiction." -Albert Einstein > > Okay for him, but not for you and me. You have already distorted science > in your head. “I have no reason to believe that there is something real behind the stories of the 'Flying Saucers.'” Source: Einstein Archives Okay for him, but not for you and me...and your kids...go ahead, distort your children's mind. Read them tonight H.G.Wells Invasion of the Cookie Monster from Outer Space.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-12 10:04 -0500
Re: "Virtual Reality" is a _model_ of reality; even when it's poorly done. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-12 18:56 -0500
Re: Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-14 20:42 -0400
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 08:47 -0500
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-15 18:01 -0400
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-16 08:45 -0500
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-16 10:31 -0700
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-16 14:34 -0700
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-16 16:25 -0700
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-16 18:47 -0700
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-17 13:35 -0700
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-17 13:37 -0700
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-17 17:52 -0400
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-08-18 13:23 -0400
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 10:25 -0700
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-18 22:17 -0700
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-19 11:04 -0700
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-20 15:18 -0700
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-18 20:09 -0700
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-18 20:17 -0700
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-18 20:29 -0700
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 17:34 -0500
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-18 20:49 -0400
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-18 20:25 -0500
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-18 23:22 -0400
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-19 10:10 -0500
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-19 08:35 -0700
Re: Reduce your meds. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-17 11:02 -0500
csiph-web