Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #390156
| Message-ID | <57B3A0E6.5503@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-16 16:25 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, rec.arts.sf.written |
| Subject | Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. |
| References | (9 earlier) <nosh5a$6sq$1@gioia.aioe.org> <57b23ba8$0$43881$c3e8da3$5e5e430d@news.astraweb.com> <L6adnfd3M9JohS7KnZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com> <57B34DE8.6606@ix.netcom.com> <e580daf6-793a-4b6b-aa6c-3a484a8526bc@googlegroups.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Gary Harnagel wrote: > > On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 at 11:31:00 AM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Tom Roberts wrote: > > > > > > "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." -- > > > Arthur C. Clarke. > > > > > > I looked at your "sufficiently advanced technology", ...I opened up the > > IBM PC, looked inside...and there was no magic. It's junk now. > > So to see ahead of you, you look at your butt? > > > All "sufficiently advanced technology" becomes just junk. > > Of course, weirdo, but that's not what Clarke was talking about. Are you > really do ignorant? > > > But, but..if you're talking about "sufficiently advanced technology" > > created by aliens from outer space...sorry, i don't read science fiction > > books. > > Then you are the poorer for it: "Lest it distort pure science and give people the false illusion of scientific understanding, he recommended complete abstinence from any type of science fiction." -Albert Einstein > > "What makes Mr. Heinlein a part of the American literary tradition is > that his characters do prevail. His work represents the fundamental > American optimism that still surprises our friends around the world. > As Mr. Heinlein taught us, the individual can and will succeed. The > first step in the individual's success is the perception that success > is possible. > > "He wrote about the future because the future is where all of us will > live. "I never think of the future - it comes soon enough." - Albert Einstein "A happy man is too satisfied with the present to dwell too much on the future." - Albert Einstein
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-12 10:04 -0500
Re: "Virtual Reality" is a _model_ of reality; even when it's poorly done. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-12 18:56 -0500
Re: Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-14 20:42 -0400
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 08:47 -0500
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-15 18:01 -0400
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-16 08:45 -0500
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-16 10:31 -0700
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-16 14:34 -0700
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-16 16:25 -0700
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-16 18:47 -0700
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-17 13:35 -0700
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-17 13:37 -0700
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-17 17:52 -0400
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-08-18 13:23 -0400
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 10:25 -0700
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-18 22:17 -0700
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-19 11:04 -0700
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-20 15:18 -0700
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-18 20:09 -0700
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-18 20:17 -0700
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-18 20:29 -0700
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 17:34 -0500
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-18 20:49 -0400
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-18 20:25 -0500
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-18 23:22 -0400
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-19 10:10 -0500
Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-19 08:35 -0700
Re: Reduce your meds. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-17 11:02 -0500
csiph-web