Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #365239

Re: The SemiRandomness of Quantum Mechanics is just ignorance.

Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date 2016-08-11 16:44 -0700
References (2 earlier) <Jeff-Relf.Me@Aug.9{7.25A.Seattle.2016}> <3a0acbf8-5c2f-4e8e-877d-1b1899996a04@googlegroups.com> <82c39daf-d7f2-4563-a3d0-36e74110f3c8@googlegroups.com> <fef7f18e-693a-4e78-94a8-97de9c17cfa6@googlegroups.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Aug.11{0.24P.Seattle.2016}>
Message-ID <a04e5fbd-507a-4077-828f-3689d2cc00a4@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: The SemiRandomness of Quantum Mechanics is just ignorance.
From Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On Friday, August 12, 2016 at 4:24:04 AM UTC+9, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> Re: " Could time travel soon become a reality ? "
>   http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2665781/Could-time-travel-soon-reality-Physicists-simulate-quantum-light-particles-travelling-past-time.html
> 
> The answer is " No ! ".
> The article says: <<
> 
>   On larger scales, time travel still remains implausible,
>   say researchers. >>
> 
> "implausible" is _quite_ the underStatement.
> 
> WormHoles require _neagive_ MassEnergy, for one thing,
> which doesn't exist in reality; see:
> 
>   http://www.hawking.org.uk/space-and-time-warps.html
>   [ Hawking is _certain_ that you can't go back in time ]
> 
> You can _imagine_ neagive MassEnergy, as Quantum Mechanics does;
> but it's _virtual_, not real.
> 
> The SemiRandomness of Quantum Mechanics is just ignorance.
> 
> Again, those who think otherwise should cut back on their caffine intake.

Jeff, how do yo explain the double slit experiment then?

http://doubleslitexperiment.com/

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: The rate at which the time axis grows, relative to the spatial dimensions. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-08 07:18 +0200
  Re: Objects there are frozen in time, to us humans. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-08 01:30 -0700
    Re: It's all relative, you know ? Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-08 07:08 -0700
      Re: _Nothing_ can change the future, present or past. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-08 11:02 -0700
        Re: _Nothing_ can change the future, present or past. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-08 13:14 -0500
      Re: _Nothing_ can change the future, present or past. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-08 22:52 +0200
        Re: _Nothing_ can change the future, present or past. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-09 06:51 -0500
          Re: _Nothing_ can change the future, present or past. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-09 17:51 -0400
      Re: _Nothing_ can change the future, present or past. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-08 20:10 -0700
        The Multiverse strikes back Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 01:34 -0700
        Re: BioLuminescence. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 02:02 -0700
          Re: Randomess is ignorance, nothing more, nothing less. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 05:54 -0700
            Re: The (4d) TimeScape is static; it's not alive, not ever. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 00:08 -0700
              Timetravel to the past possible when spacetime bends back on itself! Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 10:22 -0700
                Re: Timetravel to the past possible when spacetime bends back on itself! Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 10:28 -0700
                Re: The SemiRandomness of Quantum Mechanics is just ignorance. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 16:44 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-12 10:04 -0500
                Re: "Virtual Reality" is a _model_ of reality; even when it's poorly done. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-12 18:56 -0500
                Re: Correction: "Virtual Particles" and "Probability Waves" are intrinsically _random_. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 10:07 -0700
                Re: Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-14 20:42 -0400
                Re: Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-14 18:09 -0700
                Free Energy Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 08:26 -0700
                We can control the past! Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-16 22:46 -0700
                Re: Reduce your meds. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-17 11:02 -0500
                Re: Reduce your meds. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-17 18:24 -0700
                Wormholes could finally unite two of history's biggest physics theories Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 08:33 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-12 16:06 -0400
                Double-Slit Experiment Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 22:12 -0700

csiph-web