Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #388549

Re: The Next Game

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Vanilla Sky
> > > > > > > > > > Permutation City
> > > > > > > > > > The 13th Floor
> > > > > > > > > > Total Recall
> > > > > > > > > > Animatrix
> > > > > > > > > > The Matrix
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Life does not exist
> > > > > > > > > > anywhere else in the universe..
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > there is no law that states
> > > > > > > > > > that life exist elsewhere..
> > > > > > > > > > there is no universal law
> > > > > > > > > > or principle that states
> > > > > > > > > > life exist elsewhere
> > > > > > > > > > in the universe...
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > but out of the universe...that's The Next Game.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Since the truth is...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Life does not exist
> > > > > > > > > anywhere else in the universe..
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > NASA needs to stop searching for
> > > > > > > > > water and instead search for
> > > > > > > > > the computer or software
> > > > > > > > > running the universe.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Why bother sending rocketships to
> > > > > > > > > Mars and Jupiter which are only..
> > > > > > > > > computer simulated planets?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Instead of seearching for water, NASA
> > > > > > > > > should be searching for...
> > > > > > > > > computer errors.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > To put it simply..
> > > > > > > > the universe exist for information and entertainment purposes only.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > http://www.simulation-argument.com/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Your dreams are just for information and entertainment purposes only...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Newton's Laws are just explaining the software used in the computer simulated planets.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There simply isn't...
> > > > > > enough computer power
> > > > > > for another Earth.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If you understand...
> > > > > > how much computer power it takes,
> > > > > > to create the heavens and the earth..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > then you'll understand
> > > > > > why there can only be one earth.
> > > > >
> > > > > "We know that a dream can be real. But who ever thought that reality could be a dream?
> > > > > We exist, of course, but how, in what way? As we believe, as flesh and blood human beings, or are we simply parts of someone's feverish, complicated nightmare?
> > > > > Think about it, and then ask yourself do you live here, in this country, in this world, or do you live instead in the twilight zone? --Rod Serling
> > > >
> > > >  René Descartes raised the question: how do you know that you are not
> > > > currently dreaming? Morpheus raises a similar question:
> > > >
> > > >     Have you ever had a dream, Neo, that you were so sure was real. What
> > > > if you were unable to wake from that dream?
> > > > How would you know the difference between the dream world and the real
> > > > world?
> > >
> > > http://consc.net/papers/matrix.html
> > >
> > > of course these people (links) are from the past...
> > >
> > > i'm the future
> > >
> > > i take it to a whole new level.
> >
> > What most people don't understand is that
> > Mars, Jupiter, Pluto, etc..are in fact... computer simulations.
> 
> To end this simulation-argument...
> 
> I have proof that the universe and the earth
> is a computer simulation...the evidence is overwhelming.
> 
> For example...our Moon (a computable 0-1 particle)..
> if the dark side of the moon was facing the earth...it wouldn't
> rain..there would be no ocean.

The question "Are You Living In a Computer Simulation?" has been answered. The answer is Yes. 

I have answered it. I got the proof. It is...Indisputable.


But now, ...I have to make some simple changes in the math world.

Magnetic north and magnetic south need to be changed to: Mn=1 and Ms=0.


For example: Our moon facing us is 1, and the dark side is 0.


That's it.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-22 00:22 -0700
  Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 00:50 -0700
    Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 01:05 -0700
      Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 14:35 -0700
        Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 17:21 -0700
          Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 11:31 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 11:40 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:11 -0700
              Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:22 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:31 -0700
              Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:38 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 15:59 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-27 15:12 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-27 18:01 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-27 23:10 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-28 10:03 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-28 15:26 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 11:53 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-01 01:48 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-01 09:13 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-01 13:19 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-04 00:34 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-10 02:15 -0700
      Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-28 15:52 -0700
        Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 10:35 -0700
          Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 11:16 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 11:59 -0700
          Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 16:09 -0700
  Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 09:16 -0500
    Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 14:33 -0700
      Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 17:16 -0500
        Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 15:26 -0700
          Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 17:38 -0500
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 17:17 -0700
              Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 22:44 -0500
            Re: The Next Game benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-07-23 20:16 -0400
  [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 22:30 +0800

csiph-web