Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #388316

Re: The Next Game

Message-ID <57954842.10F7@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date 2016-07-24 15:59 -0700
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy
Subject Re: The Next Game
References (3 earlier) <5793E334.71BB@ix.netcom.com> <579409F8.4049@ix.netcom.com> <57950967.CFA@ix.netcom.com> <57951779.AED@ix.netcom.com> <57951925.454E@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Vanilla Sky
> > > > > > > > Permutation City
> > > > > > > > The 13th Floor
> > > > > > > > Total Recall
> > > > > > > > Animatrix
> > > > > > > > The Matrix
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Life does not exist
> > > > > > > > anywhere else in the universe..
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > there is no law that states
> > > > > > > > that life exist elsewhere..
> > > > > > > > there is no universal law
> > > > > > > > or principle that states
> > > > > > > > life exist elsewhere
> > > > > > > > in the universe...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > but out of the universe...that's The Next Game.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Since the truth is...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Life does not exist
> > > > > > > anywhere else in the universe..
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > NASA needs to stop searching for
> > > > > > > water and instead search for
> > > > > > > the computer or software
> > > > > > > running the universe.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Why bother sending rocketships to
> > > > > > > Mars and Jupiter which are only..
> > > > > > > computer simulated planets?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Instead of seearching for water, NASA
> > > > > > > should be searching for...
> > > > > > > computer errors.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > To put it simply..
> > > > > > the universe exist for information and entertainment purposes only.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.simulation-argument.com/
> > > > >
> > > > > Your dreams are just for information and entertainment purposes only...
> > > > >
> > > > > Newton's Laws are just explaining the software used in the computer simulated planets.
> > > >
> > > > There simply isn't...
> > > > enough computer power
> > > > for another Earth.
> > > >
> > > > If you understand...
> > > > how much computer power it takes,
> > > > to create the heavens and the earth..
> > > >
> > > > then you'll understand
> > > > why there can only be one earth.
> > >
> > > "We know that a dream can be real. But who ever thought that reality could be a dream?
> > > We exist, of course, but how, in what way? As we believe, as flesh and blood human beings, or are we simply parts of someone's feverish, complicated nightmare?
> > > Think about it, and then ask yourself do you live here, in this country, in this world, or do you live instead in the twilight zone? --Rod Serling
> >
> >  René Descartes raised the question: how do you know that you are not
> > currently dreaming? Morpheus raises a similar question:
> >
> >     Have you ever had a dream, Neo, that you were so sure was real. What
> > if you were unable to wake from that dream?
> > How would you know the difference between the dream world and the real
> > world?
> 
> http://consc.net/papers/matrix.html
> 
> of course these people (links) are from the past...
> 
> i'm the future
> 
> i take it to a whole new level.


What most people don't understand is that
Mars, Jupiter, Pluto, etc..are in fact... computer simulations.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-22 00:22 -0700
  Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 00:50 -0700
    Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 01:05 -0700
      Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 14:35 -0700
        Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 17:21 -0700
          Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 11:31 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 11:40 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:11 -0700
              Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:22 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:31 -0700
              Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:38 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 15:59 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-27 15:12 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-27 18:01 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-27 23:10 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-28 10:03 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-28 15:26 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 11:53 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-01 01:48 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-01 09:13 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-01 13:19 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-04 00:34 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-10 02:15 -0700
      Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-28 15:52 -0700
        Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 10:35 -0700
          Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 11:16 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 11:59 -0700
          Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 16:09 -0700
  Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 09:16 -0500
    Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 14:33 -0700
      Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 17:16 -0500
        Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 15:26 -0700
          Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 17:38 -0500
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 17:17 -0700
              Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 22:44 -0500
            Re: The Next Game benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-07-23 20:16 -0400
  [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 22:30 +0800

csiph-web