Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #388925

Re: The Next Game

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > you have to ask yourself the question
> > > "Where did they get the idea that magnets have a north pole and a south
> > > pole?"
> > >
> > > Is it colder in the north pole of the magnet than the south pole?
> > >
> > > Is there a big magnet at the south pole that makes the compass point
> > > north???
> > >
> > > There is no magnet on either end...
> > >
> > > It's zero, one.
> > >
> > > burn your text books.
> > >
> > > don't follow the water..
> > > follow the 0,1
> >
> > Like for example...
> >
> > Suppose you wanted to scan your brain and
> > upload it to your computer..
> > first you have to convert your brain to zeros and ones..
> >
> > Do you even know where the 0's, 1's are at????
> >
> > Okay, I'll make it simple for you...
> > it's on your north pole and your south pole.
> >
> > I'm tryin to get to your 4th grade level, but I'm
> > not sure all of yous got past the 3rd grade!
> >
> > Certaintly the lie dector industry don't have a clue...
> > http://www.polytest.org/images/pic08.jpg
> >
> > > People are computer simulations, and they
> > > are computational. The One is on your Right,
> > > and the Zero is on your Left side. The Positive side
> > > of people is on their Right side, and their
> > > Negative is on their left side.
> >
> > Certaintly the lie dectector industry don't have a clue...
> > http://www.polytest.org/images/pic08.jpg
> >
> > The criminal is on the left hand..
> > so what is the lie dectector industry
> > doing using finger tip sensors on the right hand????
> >
> > My conclusion is...your math and sciences is still back in the 1930's!!!
> 
> Look, it's very simple..
> in order to prove
> we are living in a
> computer simulation
> you first have to
> describe people
> in
> mathematical terms.
> 
> Nature's math is simple.
> 
> zero, one
> 
> I will soon show you
> a mathematical model
> of people in 0,1
> using photograph illustration.
> 
> It is indisputable.


Not only do you have to
show the mathematical model, but
also the language needs to be
converted so that others
can understand in which they
are more fimilar with.

For example:

0,1
zero, one
negative, positive
Left, Right
etc, etc..



Now, before I explain
How a person is divided
in half from head to toe,
left, right
0, 1

I'll start from
what you're most
familiar with...

or, the 'scientific community'
incomplete findings:

http://aetherforce.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/mirrorleftright.png

The scientific community have only discovered left and right for the brain,
but not the whole rest of the body.

http://aetherforce.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/mirrorleftright.png

I have to fill in their missing parts..

I will provide the missing parts soon,
but first before I do..you need to be
more familiar with what is already known.

http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2013-02-06-LeftBrainRightBrain21.jpg

I could explain that a person body on the left side is different than the
right side...for example: womans breast are both not the same size.

But, this topic is about 'People are computer simulations', so i'm
not going into the different parts sizes on both sides...
I'm focusing on proving that people are computer simulations,
living in a computer simulated universe,
so I'll be explaing it in terms of zeros and ones.

You people are to close to the trees to see the
computer...

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-22 00:22 -0700
  Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 00:50 -0700
    Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 01:05 -0700
      Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 14:35 -0700
        Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 17:21 -0700
          Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 11:31 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 11:40 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:11 -0700
              Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:22 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:31 -0700
              Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:38 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 15:59 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-27 15:12 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-27 18:01 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-27 23:10 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-28 10:03 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-28 15:26 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 11:53 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-01 01:48 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-01 09:13 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-01 13:19 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-04 00:34 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-10 02:15 -0700
      Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-28 15:52 -0700
        Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 10:35 -0700
          Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 11:16 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 11:59 -0700
          Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 16:09 -0700
  Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 09:16 -0500
    Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 14:33 -0700
      Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 17:16 -0500
        Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 15:26 -0700
          Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 17:38 -0500
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 17:17 -0700
              Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 22:44 -0500
            Re: The Next Game benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-07-23 20:16 -0400
  [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 22:30 +0800

csiph-web