Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #389682

Re: The Next Game

Message-ID <57AAF0BD.30B9@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date 2016-08-10 02:15 -0700
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, sci.math
Subject Re: The Next Game
References (14 earlier) <579BA62E.4DEF@ix.netcom.com> <579F0CCE.53BF@ix.netcom.com> <579F7513.2CFB@ix.netcom.com> <579FAEC4.254F@ix.netcom.com> <57A2EFFB.4D56@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > you have to ask yourself the question
> > > > > > > "Where did they get the idea that magnets have a north pole and a south
> > > > > > > pole?"
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Is it colder in the north pole of the magnet than the south pole?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Is there a big magnet at the south pole that makes the compass point
> > > > > > > north???
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > There is no magnet on either end...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It's zero, one.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > burn your text books.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > don't follow the water..
> > > > > > > follow the 0,1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Like for example...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Suppose you wanted to scan your brain and
> > > > > > upload it to your computer..
> > > > > > first you have to convert your brain to zeros and ones..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Do you even know where the 0's, 1's are at????
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Okay, I'll make it simple for you...
> > > > > > it's on your north pole and your south pole.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm tryin to get to your 4th grade level, but I'm
> > > > > > not sure all of yous got past the 3rd grade!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Certaintly the lie dector industry don't have a clue...
> > > > > > http://www.polytest.org/images/pic08.jpg
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > People are computer simulations, and they
> > > > > > > are computational. The One is on your Right,
> > > > > > > and the Zero is on your Left side. The Positive side
> > > > > > > of people is on their Right side, and their
> > > > > > > Negative is on their left side.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Certaintly the lie dectector industry don't have a clue...
> > > > > > http://www.polytest.org/images/pic08.jpg
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The criminal is on the left hand..
> > > > > > so what is the lie dectector industry
> > > > > > doing using finger tip sensors on the right hand????
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My conclusion is...your math and sciences is still back in the 1930's!!!
> > > > >
> > > > > Look, it's very simple..
> > > > > in order to prove
> > > > > we are living in a
> > > > > computer simulation
> > > > > you first have to
> > > > > describe people
> > > > > in
> > > > > mathematical terms.
> > > > >
> > > > > Nature's math is simple.
> > > > >
> > > > > zero, one
> > > > >
> > > > > I will soon show you
> > > > > a mathematical model
> > > > > of people in 0,1
> > > > > using photograph illustration.
> > > > >
> > > > > It is indisputable.
> > > >
> > > > Not only do you have to
> > > > show the mathematical model, but
> > > > also the language needs to be
> > > > converted so that others
> > > > can understand in which they
> > > > are more fimilar with.
> > > >
> > > > For example:
> > > >
> > > > 0,1
> > > > zero, one
> > > > negative, positive
> > > > Left, Right
> > > > etc, etc..
> > > >
> > > > Now, before I explain
> > > > How a person is divided
> > > > in half from head to toe,
> > > > left, right
> > > > 0, 1
> > > >
> > > > I'll start from
> > > > what you're most
> > > > familiar with...
> > > >
> > > > or, the 'scientific community'
> > > > incomplete findings:
> > > >
> > > > http://aetherforce.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/mirrorleftright.png
> > > >
> > > > The scientific community have only discovered left and right for the brain,
> > > > but not the whole rest of the body.
> > > >
> > > > http://aetherforce.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/mirrorleftright.png
> > > >
> > > > I have to fill in their missing parts..
> > > >
> > > > I will provide the missing parts soon,
> > > > but first before I do..you need to be
> > > > more familiar with what is already known.
> > > >
> > > > http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2013-02-06-LeftBrainRightBrain21.jpg
> > > >
> > > > I could explain that a person body on the left side is different than the
> > > > right side...for example: womans breast are both not the same size.
> > > >
> > > > But, this topic is about 'People are computer simulations', so i'm
> > > > not going into the different parts sizes on both sides...
> > > > I'm focusing on proving that people are computer simulations,
> > > > living in a computer simulated universe,
> > > > so I'll be explaing it in terms of zeros and ones.
> > > >
> > > > You people are to close to the trees to see the
> > > > computer...
> > >
> > > "A genuine smile is often asymmetric and usually larger on the right side of the face.
> > > A false smile may be more symmetrical or larger on the left side of the face."
> > >
> > > Left - false smile
> > >
> > > right - genuine smile
> > >
> > > left =  0
> > > right = 1
> > >
> > > left = minus
> > > right - plus
> > >
> > > left = negative
> > > right = positive
> > >
> > > Left - false smile
> > >
> > > right - genuine smile
> > >
> > > left = bad
> > > right = good
> > >
> > > left =  zero
> > > right = one
> > >
> > > > > in order to prove
> > > > > we are living in a
> > > > > computer simulation
> > > > > you first have to
> > > > > describe people
> > > > > in
> > > > > mathematical terms.
> > > > >
> > > > > zero, one
> > >
> > > to be continued...
> >
> > i have to provide you first with parts of
> > the picture otherwise if i show you the whole picture...you will
> > just get overwhelmed.
> >
> > It's like a blind man
> > regaining his sight
> > for the first time and
> >  seeing stairs ...
> > he does not know what the stairs are.
> >
> > He gets disoriented by his surroundings.
> >
> > I don't want you to get
> > disoriented by your surroundings
> > when you realize you're living in a
> > computer simulation universe.
> >
> > http://www.simulation-argument.com/simulation.html
> 
> After a while a 'pattern' begins to emerge...
> 
> > > "A genuine smile is often asymmetric and usually larger on the right side of the face.
> > > A false smile may be more symmetrical or larger on the left side of the face."
> 
> The left seems to have a pattern of....being negative, zero, left=bad, 0, minus...
> 
> "I've got two left feet."
> 
> In order for me to demostrate that you're a computer simulation,
> I first have to make sure you're familar with...zero, one.
> 
> Every person you see on earth is in fact an...optical illusion.
> 
> If you don't separate the left from the right...you're just going to see
> an optical illusion. The left and the right meld to form the illusion.
> 
> I will remove the illusion.
> 
> to be continued...
>

to be continued...

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-22 00:22 -0700
  Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 00:50 -0700
    Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 01:05 -0700
      Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 14:35 -0700
        Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 17:21 -0700
          Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 11:31 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 11:40 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:11 -0700
              Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:22 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:31 -0700
              Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 12:38 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-24 15:59 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-27 15:12 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-27 18:01 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-27 23:10 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-28 10:03 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-28 15:26 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 11:53 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-01 01:48 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-01 09:13 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-01 13:19 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-04 00:34 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-10 02:15 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-26 00:36 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-27 16:43 -0700
                Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-29 10:23 -0700
                Re: The Next Game "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-08-29 12:27 -0700
      Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-28 15:52 -0700
        Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 10:35 -0700
          Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 11:16 -0700
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 11:59 -0700
          Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-29 16:09 -0700
  Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 09:16 -0500
    Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 14:33 -0700
      Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 17:16 -0500
        Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 15:26 -0700
          Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 17:38 -0500
            Re: The Next Game The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-23 17:17 -0700
              Re: The Next Game Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-23 22:44 -0500
            Re: The Next Game benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-07-23 20:16 -0400
  [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 22:30 +0800

csiph-web