Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #370728

Re: 'Based On Nonsense'

Message-ID	<56536B19.791D@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	2015-11-23 11:38 -0800
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	alt.astronomy, rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: 'Based On Nonsense'
References	(1 earlier) <564F6DC6.127E@ix.netcom.com> <56511756.777C@ix.netcom.com> <XOc4y.155775$sK.94170@fx14.iad> <U9OdnfkYUI4s287LnZ2dnUU7_82dnZ2d@giganews.com> <3f7ed398-e182-49b5-a563-1099f741f854@googlegroups.com>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Gary Harnagel wrote:
> 
> On Monday, November 23, 2015 at 10:02:43 AM UTC-7, tjrob137 wrote:
> >
> > I believe that the consensus among physicists who have thought about
> > this is that the existence of alien life is not only possible, but
> > reasonably probable (but none of us quantify that).
> 
> Fred Hoyle DID present his quantification:
> 
> "Life cannot have had a random beginning ... The trouble is that there are
> about two thousand enzymes, and the chance of obtaining them all in a
> random trial is only one part in 1040,000, an outrageously small
> probability that could not be faced even if the whole universe consisted
> of organic soup." - Fred Hoyle
> 
> I think that he was just a bit pessimistic, and so does everyone at SETI
> or they wouldn't be there :-)  Frank Drake tried it a different way and
> came up with a few civilizations at our stage of development in our
> galaxy right now.  Maybe we'll get a better read on the probability by
> studying Tabby's star ...



Frank Drake calculations is WRONG. It is based on Mars having life on it's surface, and it does not...so that means
you need to throw Frank Drake's calculations into the garbage where it belongs.

Thread

Based On Nonsense The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-20 10:49 -0800
  Re: Based On Nonsense The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-20 11:00 -0800
    Re: Based On Nonsense The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-21 17:16 -0800
      Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 00:57 -0500
        Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-21 23:11 -0800
          Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-22 09:30 +0100
            Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-22 00:41 -0800
              Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 08:40 -0500
                Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-22 13:00 -0800
                Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-26 07:10 +0100
                Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-26 09:01 -0600
                Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-26 07:11 -0800
          Re: Based On Nonsense The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-22 21:37 -0800
            Re: Based On Nonsense The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-24 22:08 -0800
              Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-25 07:40 +0100
                Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-25 10:24 -0800
                Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbBertopal.org> - 2015-11-25 18:32 +0000
                Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-25 12:01 -0800
                Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-26 04:48 +0100
                Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbBertopal.org> - 2015-11-26 14:21 +0000
                Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-27 08:05 +0100
        Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-11-23 11:02 -0600
          Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-23 11:20 -0800
            Re: 'Based On Nonsense' The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-23 11:38 -0800
            Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Walter Ilinois <walin@wej98j5q.org> - 2015-11-23 20:44 +0000
            Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 16:35 -0700
              Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-23 19:35 -0800
                Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-11-25 09:20 -0600
                Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-25 08:29 -0800
          Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-27 11:14 -0800
            Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-27 12:00 -0800
            Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-27 16:53 -0800
            Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-27 19:15 -0800
              Re: We're robots, programmed to get food, water, air, etc. Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-28 08:43 -0800
        Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-11-26 08:26 -0500
          Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2015-12-09 10:34 +0000
            Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-12-09 08:31 -0600
              Re: ‘Based On Nonsense’ Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2015-12-10 19:29 +0000
  Re: 'Based On Nonsense' pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-11-20 12:59 -0800
    Re: 'Based On Nonsense' kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-20 16:48 -0500
      Re: 'Based On Nonsense' pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-11-20 15:42 -0800
        Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-20 17:12 -0800
          Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-21 06:32 +0100
          Re: 'Based On Nonsense' pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-11-20 22:13 -0800
            Re: 'Based On Nonsense' kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-21 02:24 -0500
              Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-21 09:59 +0100
                Re: 'Based On Nonsense' pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-11-21 10:38 -0800
                Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-22 06:18 +0100
                Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-23 04:41 +0100
            Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-21 06:34 -0800
              Re: 'Based On Nonsense' benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-21 13:50 -0500
                Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-21 11:42 -0800
          Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-11-21 09:42 -0600
            Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbertopal.org> - 2015-11-21 16:31 +0000
              Re: 'Based On Nonsense' benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-21 13:54 -0500
                Re: 'Based On Nonsense' pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-11-21 11:01 -0800
            Re: 'Based On Nonsense' Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-21 08:47 -0800
              Re: 'Based On Nonsense' benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-21 14:09 -0500
                Re: 'Based On Nonsense' pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-11-21 17:44 -0800
          Re: 'Based On Nonsense' dsr@mail.lns.cornell.edu (Daniel S. Riley) - 2015-11-22 13:38 -0500

csiph-web