Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.crypt > #50223 > unrolled thread

SUSE Reviving Usenet

Started by711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart>
First post2021-09-29 09:04 -0500
Last post2021-10-12 09:38 -0500
Articles 20 on this page of 160 — 35 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.crypt

Contents

  SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-29 09:04 -0500
    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-29 14:44 +0000
      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> - 2021-09-30 01:44 -0400
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-09-30 12:25 -0400
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-30 14:03 -0500
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2021-09-30 23:36 +0000
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 20:20 -0400
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2021-09-30 14:45 -1000
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-01 06:30 +0000
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-10-01 14:48 +0000
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-01 17:43 +0000
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-10-01 13:47 -0400
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-01 17:56 +0000
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Stefan Claas <spam.trap.usenet@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 11:41 -0700
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> - 2021-10-01 22:07 -0400
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-01 20:49 +0100
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-01 22:03 +0000
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> - 2021-10-02 10:49 -0400
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-02 15:13 +0000
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 12:49 -0400
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 13:34 -0700
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 20:04 -0400
                      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:50 +0000
                        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2021-10-03 05:52 +0000
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet chris <chris-nospam@tridac.net> - 2021-10-20 00:00 +0100
                      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-03 17:31 +0000
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-02 23:13 -0500
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:48 +0000
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> - 2021-10-02 22:23 -0400
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2021-10-02 16:07 +0000
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-02 18:06 +0100
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2021-10-02 19:55 +0000
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-02 22:17 +0100
                      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2021-10-03 08:15 +0000
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-10-02 13:29 -0400
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2021-10-02 07:53 -1000
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Alan Ralph <usenet@alanralph.co.uk> - 2021-10-02 18:58 +0000
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-02 23:27 -0500
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Alan Ralph <usenet@alanralph.co.uk> - 2021-10-03 15:34 +0000
                      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 01:05 -0500
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2021-10-02 20:04 -0400
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-10-04 14:17 +0000
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-04 16:42 +0100
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-10-04 17:17 +0100
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 16:38 +0000
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2021-10-04 16:10 -0400
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> - 2021-10-05 00:11 -0400
                      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2021-10-05 08:31 -0400
                        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> - 2021-10-05 11:34 -0400
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-10-05 17:31 +0000
                            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2021-10-06 09:31 +0100
                            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> - 2021-10-08 18:53 -0400
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-05 17:41 +0000
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2021-10-05 20:58 -0400
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-05 06:38 +0100
                      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-05 01:26 -0500
                        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-05 08:12 +0100
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-05 03:41 -0500
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-05 23:04 +0000
                        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-05 06:48 -0700
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-10-05 14:17 +0000
                            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-05 23:03 -0500
                              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-06 04:58 +0000
                                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 00:59 -0500
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2021-10-04 16:00 -0400
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2021-11-25 20:13 +0000
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2021-11-26 04:02 +0000
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2021-10-01 23:19 -0500
      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet usenet@only.tnx (Questor) - 2021-09-30 18:38 +0000
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-30 19:26 +0000
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-09-30 21:39 +0200
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-01 17:43 +0000
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-10-01 21:32 +0200
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-10-01 20:31 +0000
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-01 21:24 +0000
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-02 11:12 -0500
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-02 18:09 +0100
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-02 18:32 +0000
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-02 20:41 +0100
                      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-02 23:40 -0500
                        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-03 17:31 +0000
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-10-03 13:31 +0200
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Stefan Claas <spam.trap.usenet@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 05:15 -0700
                      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Stefan Claas <spam.trap.usenet@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 05:27 -0700
                        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-03 13:35 +0000
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Stefan Claas <spam.trap.usenet@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 07:07 -0700
                            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-03 23:06 -0500
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-10-03 16:25 +0000
                            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Stefan Claas <spam.trap.usenet@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 10:00 -0700
                              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-10-04 14:09 +0000
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-03 22:57 -0500
                      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-10-04 14:06 +0200
                        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-04 14:11 +0100
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-10-05 10:28 +0200
                            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-05 10:44 +0100
                        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-10-04 14:21 +0000
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 15:29 +0000
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-10-05 11:04 +0200
                        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet lawrence@cluon.com (Lawrence Statton (NK1G)) - 2021-10-04 13:42 -0500
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ulick Magee <ulickmagee@feckoff.invalid> - 2021-11-09 23:55 +0000
                      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2021-11-09 20:44 -0600
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-01 06:22 +0100
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-10-01 14:55 +0000
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-01 17:19 +0100
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-10-01 17:13 +0000
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 17:30 -0400
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2021-10-01 18:27 +0000
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com.invalid> - 2021-10-01 22:46 +0200
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-01 21:26 +0000
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) - 2021-10-02 01:12 -0500
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-02 11:08 +0000
    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-09-29 16:25 +0100
      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-30 08:17 -0500
    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Jason Evans <jsevans@mailfence.com> - 2021-09-29 15:56 +0000
      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2021-09-29 17:22 +0100
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-30 08:23 -0500
      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-30 08:22 -0500
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-30 13:27 +0000
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-30 12:58 -0500
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-09-30 19:12 +0100
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 13:16 -0700
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-30 15:59 -0500
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 17:38 -0700
    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-29 17:36 +0000
    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-29 22:32 +0000
      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-30 08:25 -0500
    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 10:57 -0500
      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2021-10-02 22:07 +0000
      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-02 23:07 -0500
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 11:46 -0500
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-03 18:14 +0100
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-03 17:35 +0000
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Stefan Claas <spam.trap.usenet@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 10:45 -0700
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 14:28 -0400
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-03 17:31 +0000
    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org> - 2021-10-06 15:55 +0300
      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-10-06 14:35 +0100
      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 00:37 -0500
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-07 07:04 +0100
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-07 18:30 +0000
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2021-10-07 08:47 -0400
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-10-07 13:07 +0000
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 18:16 -0500
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-10-08 00:08 +0000
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 20:50 -0500
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-12 09:32 -0500
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 18:38 -0500
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org> - 2021-10-07 17:42 +0300
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 18:26 -0500
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-07 23:44 +0000
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 20:23 -0500
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-08 01:27 +0000
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 20:56 -0500
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-08 01:58 +0000
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-07 20:01 -0700
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-08 00:54 -0500
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-10-12 12:23 -0500
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-12 13:35 -0500
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-12 16:16 -0700
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-12 09:38 -0500

Page 7 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8  Next page →

#50254

From"Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Date2021-09-30 13:16 -0700
Message-ID<sj55vg$1e1s$3@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#50244
On 9/30/2021 11:12 AM, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Sep 2021 12:58:04 -0500
> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote:
> 
>> It's as if the gremlin knows a problem has been solved and so it creates
>> two new ones.
> 
> <raises lightning rod>
> 
> 	Gremlins evolve like everything else.
> 


Have you ever fed them past midnight? Ouch. ;^)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50255

From711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart>
Date2021-09-30 15:59 -0500
Message-ID<sj58d2$eih$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#50254
On 9/30/21 3:16 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 9/30/2021 11:12 AM, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Sep 2021 12:58:04 -0500
>> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote:
>>
>>> It's as if the gremlin knows a problem has been solved and so it creates
>>> two new ones.
>>
>> <raises lightning rod>
>>
>>     Gremlins evolve like everything else.
>>
> 
> 
> Have you ever fed them past midnight? Ouch. ;^)

Just be sure you don't feed *me* after midnight!

Unless it's pizza, that's ok.

-- 
███████████████████████████████████
█░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░███
█░░███████░░█░░████░░███░░████░░███        [chan] 711
█░░░░░░░██░░█░░░░██░░███░░░░██░░███        spooky mart
██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███        always open
██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███        stay spooky
██████░░██░░█░░░░██░░░░█░░░░██░░░░█        https://bitmessage.org
██████░░██░░█░░██████░░█░░██████░░█
██████░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█
███████████████████████████████████

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50284

From"Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Date2021-10-01 17:38 -0700
Message-ID<sj89mi$fe1$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#50255
On 9/30/2021 1:59 PM, 711 Spooky Mart wrote:
> On 9/30/21 3:16 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 9/30/2021 11:12 AM, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote:
>>> On Thu, 30 Sep 2021 12:58:04 -0500
>>> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It's as if the gremlin knows a problem has been solved and so it creates
>>>> two new ones.
>>>
>>> <raises lightning rod>
>>>
>>>      Gremlins evolve like everything else.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Have you ever fed them past midnight? Ouch. ;^)
> 
> Just be sure you don't feed *me* after midnight!
> 
> Unless it's pizza, that's ok.
> 

:^D Indeed! lol.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50231

FromJan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com>
Date2021-09-29 17:36 +0000
Message-ID<sj28cn$tdj$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#50223
On a sunny day (Wed, 29 Sep 2021 09:04:16 -0500) it happened 711 Spooky Mart
<711@spooky.mart> wrote in <sj1rna$144n$1@gioia.aioe.org>:

>I've heard many times that Usenet is dead. I never stopped using Usenet.
>I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never considered it dead.
>It's obscure because most people are mesmerized by social media, reddit,
>and the like. Let the proles and zombies have their addictive behavior
>modeling distractions. As for me and my net, we will serve the ASCII.
>
>Anyone can set up a news server with their own hierarchies. In fact some
>organizations still do just that. I am considering how to run my own
>NNTP rig on a VPS with sci.crypt on the roster. I also am thinking of
>how to set up a Bitmessage <--> Usenet gateway that mirrors Bitmessage
>chans as Usenet hierarchies.
>
>It seems SUSE realizes that Usenet is a treasure.

I sure hope it is nit an covered up attempt to censor Usenet,
                We Need No Control

Youtube is canceling channels with 600,000 subscribers...
 https://www.rt.com/news/536068-rt-de-youtube-channel-deleted/
 https://www.rt.com/news/536174-youtube-bans-anti-vax/

AND soon you will all need to be chipped like your pet dog to do anything.
Big Brothel will follow and control you, and issue the KILL command if you do not comply

My newsreader still works, see headers, but libforms has changed, so much for Suse.
Running Slackware

Secret message: baaaah

plaintext: <if all else fails use smake signs>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50234

FromBranimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com>
Date2021-09-29 22:32 +0000
Message-ID<JP55J.158285$o45.61841@fx46.iad>
In reply to#50223
On 2021-09-29, 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote:
> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead. I never stopped using Usenet.
> I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never considered it dead.
> It's obscure because most people are mesmerized by social media, reddit,
> and the like. Let the proles and zombies have their addictive behavior
> modeling distractions. As for me and my net, we will serve the ASCII.
>
usenet is not for average JOE. It is for open minded people, and
Google make it accessible which is WRONG, and it's BUGGy client
makes it WORSE.


-- 

7-77-777
Evil Sinner!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50239

From711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart>
Date2021-09-30 08:25 -0500
Message-ID<sj4ds4$1v5d$3@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#50234
On 9/29/21 5:32 PM, Branimir Maksimovic wrote:
> On 2021-09-29, 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote:
>> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead. I never stopped using Usenet.
>> I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never considered it dead.
>> It's obscure because most people are mesmerized by social media, reddit,
>> and the like. Let the proles and zombies have their addictive behavior
>> modeling distractions. As for me and my net, we will serve the ASCII.
>>
> usenet is not for average JOE. It is for open minded people, and
> Google make it accessible which is WRONG, and it's BUGGy client
> makes it WORSE.

Google knows how to make a simple thing three orders of magnitude more
complicated.

-- 
███████████████████████████████████
█░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░███
█░░███████░░█░░████░░███░░████░░███        [chan] 711
█░░░░░░░██░░█░░░░██░░███░░░░██░░███        spooky mart
██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███        always open
██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███        stay spooky
██████░░██░░█░░░░██░░░░█░░░░██░░░░█        https://bitmessage.org
██████░░██░░█░░██████░░█░░██████░░█
██████░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█
███████████████████████████████████

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50303

FromD.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com>
Date2021-10-02 10:57 -0500
Message-ID<m10hlgtktre74i26ochbi7156uaj9np8ed@4ax.com>
In reply to#50223
On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 09:04:16 -0500, 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart>
wrote:
>I've heard many times that Usenet is dead. I never stopped using Usenet.
>I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never considered it dead.
>It's obscure because most people are mesmerized by social media, reddit,
>and the like. Let the proles and zombies have their addictive behavior
>modeling distractions. As for me and my net, we will serve the ASCII.

I first got onto Usenet about fall of 1991, via a feed on a
Professor's Windows ms-dos 386 computer withl imited groups.

The university computer staff on main campus had told us 'newsgroups
are impossible at this time'.

So, we went about proving they were wrong.

My branch campus got Usenet in 1992. I vaguely remember my first posts
happening to here and a few other places. Unfortunately, my posts i
have are on floppy, and no drive. I have some backups on external usb
drives, and some on CDs, from 2000 up through today.

When I tried to go back on Google groups, they stopped at about 2003.
With hints there were some earlier, but I couldn't find them.

Anyway, I got onto dial-up, then a cable modem a few years after that.
Moved a few times, so my email address has changed about 5 to 8 times.
I'm not sure just how many.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50320

FromThomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de>
Date2021-10-02 22:07 +0000
Message-ID<sjal6s$r73$1@newsreader4.netcologne.de>
In reply to#50303
D.J <chucktheouch@gmail.com> schrieb:
> On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 09:04:16 -0500, 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart>
> wrote:
>>I've heard many times that Usenet is dead. I never stopped using Usenet.
>>I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never considered it dead.
>>It's obscure because most people are mesmerized by social media, reddit,
>>and the like. Let the proles and zombies have their addictive behavior
>>modeling distractions. As for me and my net, we will serve the ASCII.
>
> I first got onto Usenet about fall of 1991, via a feed on a
> Professor's Windows ms-dos 386 computer withl imited groups.

Just checked a few of my old posts.  One of the firste posts I
find is from 1992 (with a different e-mail at the time), but
I think I started somewhat earlier.

I had access to the sf-lovers mailing previously for a time,
which was a a one-way gateway to Usenet when you sent articles
and a partial digest you got back (you could never be sure if your
own articles would be deemed worthy of inclusion).

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50326

From711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart>
Date2021-10-02 23:07 -0500
Message-ID<sjbab3$1a3a$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#50303
On 10/2/21 10:57 AM, D.J. wrote:

> The university computer staff on main campus had told us 'newsgroups
> are impossible at this time'.
> 
> So, we went about proving they were wrong.

Never tell a geek what is possible or allowable. That invites mayhem. ;)

-- 
███████████████████████████████████
█░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░███
█░░███████░░█░░████░░███░░████░░███        [chan] 711
█░░░░░░░██░░█░░░░██░░███░░░░██░░███        spooky mart
██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███        always open
██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███        stay spooky
██████░░██░░█░░░░██░░░░█░░░░██░░░░█        https://bitmessage.org
██████░░██░░█░░██████░░█░░██████░░█
██████░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█
███████████████████████████████████

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50343

FromD.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com>
Date2021-10-03 11:46 -0500
Message-ID<jhnjlg9aag35pls39nvm0h8rf6icr6cps0@4ax.com>
In reply to#50326
On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 23:07:59 -0500, 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart>
wrote:
>On 10/2/21 10:57 AM, D.J. wrote:
>
>> The university computer staff on main campus had told us 'newsgroups
>> are impossible at this time'.
>> 
>> So, we went about proving they were wrong.
>
>Never tell a geek what is possible or allowable. That invites mayhem. ;)

They were geeks to, but not very good ones at what they did.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50345

FromAhem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net>
Date2021-10-03 18:14 +0100
Message-ID<20211003181459.255656d46b9133d200e5e132@eircom.net>
In reply to#50326
On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 23:07:59 -0500
711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote:

> On 10/2/21 10:57 AM, D.J. wrote:
> 
> > The university computer staff on main campus had told us 'newsgroups
> > are impossible at this time'.
> > 
> > So, we went about proving they were wrong.
> 
> Never tell a geek what is possible or allowable. That invites mayhem. ;)

	Indeed, if you want to prevent geeks from doing something make it
very clear that the something is the kind of boring silly stunt that only
clueless idiots do because it's easy and makes trouble and nobody with half
a brain would bother.

	That approach pretty much kept the 370 from being hacked by
students at Cambridge[1] - that and the "we catch you at it we revoke your
access" policy.

[1] The only example I recall in three years was an ASCII[2] art Enterprise
flying round all the terminals in the room late one night - the image was
bigger than a terminal.
[2] I think all the terminals were ASCII - there was a pair of PDP-11s
between the 370 and the terminals.

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith
Odds and Ends at http://www.sohara.org/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50349

FromCharlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>
Date2021-10-03 17:35 +0000
Message-ID<ERl6J.154382$Kv2.52335@fx47.iad>
In reply to#50345
On 2021-10-03, Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> wrote:

> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 23:07:59 -0500
> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote:
>
>> On 10/2/21 10:57 AM, D.J. wrote:
>> 
>>> The university computer staff on main campus had told us 'newsgroups
>>> are impossible at this time'.
>>> 
>>> So, we went about proving they were wrong.
>> 
>> Never tell a geek what is possible or allowable. That invites mayhem. ;)
>
> 	Indeed, if you want to prevent geeks from doing something make it
> very clear that the something is the kind of boring silly stunt that only
> clueless idiots do because it's easy and makes trouble and nobody with half
> a brain would bother.

That pretty much sums up my approach to cat-proofing: make it boring.

-- 
/~\  Charlie Gibbs                  |  Life is perverse.
\ /  <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>      |  It can be beautiful -
 X   I'm really at ac.dekanfrus     |  but it won't.
/ \  if you read it the right way.  |    -- Lily Tomlin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50350

FromStefan Claas <spam.trap.usenet@gmail.com>
Date2021-10-03 10:45 -0700
Message-ID<5fa88d45-cb61-49e4-9786-92b7d799d93fn@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#50349
On Sunday, October 3, 2021 at 7:35:36 PM UTC+2, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> On 2021-10-03, Ahem A Rivet's Shot <ste...@eircom.net> wrote: 
> 
> > On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 23:07:59 -0500 
> > 711 Spooky Mart <7...@spooky.mart> wrote: 
> > 
> >> On 10/2/21 10:57 AM, D.J. wrote: 
> >> 
> >>> The university computer staff on main campus had told us 'newsgroups 
> >>> are impossible at this time'. 
> >>> 
> >>> So, we went about proving they were wrong. 
> >> 
> >> Never tell a geek what is possible or allowable. That invites mayhem. ;) 
> > 
> > Indeed, if you want to prevent geeks from doing something make it 
> > very clear that the something is the kind of boring silly stunt that only 
> > clueless idiots do because it's easy and makes trouble and nobody with half 
> > a brain would bother.
> That pretty much sums up my approach to cat-proofing: make it boring.

Maybe a language barrier from my side, but cybercrime, for example,
is the third largest 'economy' after the United States and China.

And cyber units around the globe, 'pen testing' systems may do not
find things made boring for them.

Regards
Stefan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50353

FromJ. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com>
Date2021-10-03 14:28 -0400
Message-ID<edtjlgha4ga9amfoh33l4pc829qqqgq9eh@4ax.com>
In reply to#50349
On Sun, 03 Oct 2021 17:35:32 GMT, Charlie Gibbs
<cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> wrote:

>On 2021-10-03, Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 23:07:59 -0500
>> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/2/21 10:57 AM, D.J. wrote:
>>> 
>>>> The university computer staff on main campus had told us 'newsgroups
>>>> are impossible at this time'.
>>>> 
>>>> So, we went about proving they were wrong.
>>> 
>>> Never tell a geek what is possible or allowable. That invites mayhem. ;)
>>
>> 	Indeed, if you want to prevent geeks from doing something make it
>> very clear that the something is the kind of boring silly stunt that only
>> clueless idiots do because it's easy and makes trouble and nobody with half
>> a brain would bother.
>
>That pretty much sums up my approach to cat-proofing: make it boring.

I have long felt that the easiest way to prevent teenagers from having
sex is to give them classes in that topic at the usual level of
public-school pedagogy.  Hormones may defeat boringness but at least
boringness will put up a fight.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50348

FromCharlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>
Date2021-10-03 17:31 +0000
Message-ID<5Ol6J.138402$lC6.9121@fx41.iad>
In reply to#50326
On 2021-10-03, 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote:

> On 10/2/21 10:57 AM, D.J. wrote:
>
>> The university computer staff on main campus had told us 'newsgroups
>> are impossible at this time'.
>> 
>> So, we went about proving they were wrong.
>
> Never tell a geek what is possible or allowable. That invites mayhem. ;)

    Always listen to experts.  They'll tell you
    what can't be done, and why.  Then do it.

      -- Robert A. Heinlein: The Notebooks of Lazarus Long

-- 
/~\  Charlie Gibbs                  |  Life is perverse.
\ /  <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>      |  It can be beautiful -
 X   I'm really at ac.dekanfrus     |  but it won't.
/ \  if you read it the right way.  |    -- Lily Tomlin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50418

FromPhil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org>
Date2021-10-06 15:55 +0300
Message-ID<87o882cnxc.fsf@zotaspaz.fatphil.org>
In reply to#50223
711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes:
> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead. I never stopped using Usenet.
> I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never considered it dead.

Why's your sig so obnoxious, then? You sure look like a newb with one
that long.

-- 
We are no longer hunters and nomads. No longer awed and frightened, as
we have gained some understanding of the world in which we live. As such,
we can cast aside childish remnants from the dawn of our civilization.
-- NotSanguine on SoylentNews, after Eugen Weber in /The Western Tradition/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50419

FromRichard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk>
Date2021-10-06 14:35 +0100
Message-ID<sjk8mh$2vp$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#50418
On 06/10/2021 13:55, Phil Carmody wrote:
> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes:
>> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead. I never stopped using Usenet.
>> I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never considered it dead.
> 
> Why's your sig so obnoxious, then? You sure look like a newb with one
> that long.

He looked like a newb to me too, but then he ran smack into my killfile, 
and now he don't look like no nothin' at all.

-- 
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50424

From711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart>
Date2021-10-07 00:37 -0500
Message-ID<sjm10b$lql$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#50418
On 10/6/21 7:55 AM, Phil Carmody wrote:
> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> writes:
>> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead. I never stopped using Usenet.
>> I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never considered it dead.
> 
> Why's your sig so obnoxious, then? You sure look like a newb with one
> that long.

I suspect you are another Emacs user. Emacs lacking proper support for
UTF-8 is obnoxious. That would make you the noob.

https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/UnicodeEncoding

Just because you persist in using niche software that hasn't caught up
with the times, it does not follow that my sig is obnoxious.

Silly comment though, coming from a user with a signature that is 50
words long! That's 40 words more than my sig.

-- 
███████████████████████████████████
█░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░███
█░░███████░░█░░████░░███░░████░░███        [chan] 711
█░░░░░░░██░░█░░░░██░░███░░░░██░░███        spooky mart
██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███        always open
██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███        stay spooky
██████░░██░░█░░░░██░░░░█░░░░██░░░░█        https://bitmessage.org
██████░░██░░█░░██████░░█░░██████░░█
██████░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█
███████████████████████████████████

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50428

FromAhem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net>
Date2021-10-07 07:04 +0100
Message-ID<20211007070401.628720edb6d57d9b041b99a3@eircom.net>
In reply to#50424
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 00:37:14 -0500
711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote:

> Silly comment though, coming from a user with a signature that is 50
> words long! That's 40 words more than my sig.

	There is an RFC that suggests a limit of four lines for the sig, it
is commonly followed.

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith
Odds and Ends at http://www.sohara.org/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#50435

FromBranimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com>
Date2021-10-07 18:30 +0000
Message-ID<21H7J.52908$3p3.13935@fx16.iad>
In reply to#50428
On 2021-10-07, Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 00:37:14 -0500
> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote:
>
>> Silly comment though, coming from a user with a signature that is 50
>> words long! That's 40 words more than my sig.
>
> 	There is an RFC that suggests a limit of four lines for the sig, it
> is commonly followed.
>

Well, I changed now to three, as one should be blank line :P

-- 

7-77-777
Evil Sinner!
with software, you repeat same experiment, expecting different results...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 7 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.crypt

csiph-web