Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1583230 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 1/1] gpio: altera: Use handle_level_irq when configured as a level_high

Started byPhil Reid <preid@electromag.com.au>
First post2017-02-17 10:20 +0100
Last post2017-02-23 16:00 +0100
Articles 5 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH 1/1] gpio: altera: Use handle_level_irq when configured as a level_high Phil Reid <preid@electromag.com.au> - 2017-02-17 10:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: altera: Use handle_level_irq when configured as  a level_high Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 10:30 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: altera: Use handle_level_irq when configured as  a level_high Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 12:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: altera: Use handle_level_irq when configured as  a level_high Phil Reid <preid@electromag.com.au> - 2017-02-17 12:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: altera: Use handle_level_irq when configured as  a level_high Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2017-02-23 16:00 +0100

#1583230 — [PATCH 1/1] gpio: altera: Use handle_level_irq when configured as a level_high

FromPhil Reid <preid@electromag.com.au>
Date2017-02-17 10:20 +0100
Subject[PATCH 1/1] gpio: altera: Use handle_level_irq when configured as a level_high
Message-ID<tbMRQ-2p0-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
When a threaded irq handler is chained attached to one of the gpio
pins when configure for level irq the altera_gpio_irq_leveL_high_handler
does not mask the interrupt while being handled by the chained irq.
This resulting in the threaded irq not getting enough cycles to complete
quickly enough before the irq was disabled as faulty.
It looks like handle_level_irq should be used in this situation
instead of handle_simple_irq.

Signed-off-by: Phil Reid <preid@electromag.com.au>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-altera.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-altera.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-altera.c
index 5bddbd5..d67dcca 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-altera.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-altera.c
@@ -310,7 +310,8 @@ static int altera_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	altera_gc->interrupt_trigger = reg;
 
 	ret = gpiochip_irqchip_add(&altera_gc->mmchip.gc, &altera_irq_chip, 0,
-		handle_simple_irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
+		altera_gc->interrupt_trigger == IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH ?
+		handle_level_irq : handle_simple_irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
 
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not add irqchip\n");
-- 
1.8.3.1

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1583235 — Re: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: altera: Use handle_level_irq when configured as a level_high

FromAndy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date2017-02-17 10:30 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: altera: Use handle_level_irq when configured as a level_high
Message-ID<tbN1w-2tF-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1583230
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Phil Reid <preid@electromag.com.au> wrote:
> When a threaded irq handler is chained attached to one of the gpio
> pins when configure for level irq the altera_gpio_irq_leveL_high_handler
> does not mask the interrupt while being handled by the chained irq.
> This resulting in the threaded irq not getting enough cycles to complete
> quickly enough before the irq was disabled as faulty.
> It looks like handle_level_irq should be used in this situation
> instead of handle_simple_irq.

> @@ -310,7 +310,8 @@ static int altera_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         altera_gc->interrupt_trigger = reg;
>
>         ret = gpiochip_irqchip_add(&altera_gc->mmchip.gc, &altera_irq_chip, 0,
> -               handle_simple_irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
> +               altera_gc->interrupt_trigger == IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH ?
> +               handle_level_irq : handle_simple_irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);

AFAIK, handle_bad_irq() should be used here.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1583366 — Re: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: altera: Use handle_level_irq when configured as a level_high

FromAndy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date2017-02-17 12:50 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: altera: Use handle_level_irq when configured as a level_high
Message-ID<tbPcZ-3La-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1583235
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Phil Reid <preid@electromag.com.au> wrote:
> On 17/02/2017 17:23, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Phil Reid <preid@electromag.com.au>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> When a threaded irq handler is chained attached to one of the gpio
>>> pins when configure for level irq the altera_gpio_irq_leveL_high_handler
>>> does not mask the interrupt while being handled by the chained irq.
>>> This resulting in the threaded irq not getting enough cycles to complete
>>> quickly enough before the irq was disabled as faulty.
>>> It looks like handle_level_irq should be used in this situation
>>> instead of handle_simple_irq.
>>
>>
>>> @@ -310,7 +310,8 @@ static int altera_gpio_probe(struct platform_device
>>> *pdev)
>>>         altera_gc->interrupt_trigger = reg;
>>>
>>>         ret = gpiochip_irqchip_add(&altera_gc->mmchip.gc,
>>> &altera_irq_chip, 0,
>>> -               handle_simple_irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
>>> +               altera_gc->interrupt_trigger == IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH ?
>>> +               handle_level_irq : handle_simple_irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
>>
>>
>> AFAIK, handle_bad_irq() should be used here.
>>
> G'day Andy
>
> Grepping drivers/gpio find a combination of
> handle_simple_irq
> handle_level_irq
> handle_edge_irq
> handle_bad_irq
> used in gpiochip_irqchip_add

Try to add date of change and amount of use.
I bet handle_bad_irq() would be the winner.

> The ones which use handle_bad_irq call irq_set_handler_locked in their
> irq_type callback to either handle_level_irq / handle_edge_irq

Yep.

> So I think in this case it's correct. But I'm no expert.

I dunno.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1583367 — Re: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: altera: Use handle_level_irq when configured as a level_high

FromPhil Reid <preid@electromag.com.au>
Date2017-02-17 12:50 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: altera: Use handle_level_irq when configured as a level_high
Message-ID<tbPcZ-3La-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1583235
On 17/02/2017 17:23, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Phil Reid <preid@electromag.com.au> wrote:
>> When a threaded irq handler is chained attached to one of the gpio
>> pins when configure for level irq the altera_gpio_irq_leveL_high_handler
>> does not mask the interrupt while being handled by the chained irq.
>> This resulting in the threaded irq not getting enough cycles to complete
>> quickly enough before the irq was disabled as faulty.
>> It looks like handle_level_irq should be used in this situation
>> instead of handle_simple_irq.
>
>> @@ -310,7 +310,8 @@ static int altera_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>         altera_gc->interrupt_trigger = reg;
>>
>>         ret = gpiochip_irqchip_add(&altera_gc->mmchip.gc, &altera_irq_chip, 0,
>> -               handle_simple_irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
>> +               altera_gc->interrupt_trigger == IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH ?
>> +               handle_level_irq : handle_simple_irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
>
> AFAIK, handle_bad_irq() should be used here.
>
G'day Andy

Grepping drivers/gpio find a combination of
handle_simple_irq
handle_level_irq
handle_edge_irq
handle_bad_irq
used in gpiochip_irqchip_add

The ones which use handle_bad_irq call irq_set_handler_locked in their
irq_type callback to either handle_level_irq / handle_edge_irq

So I think in this case it's correct. But I'm no expert.

-- 
Regards
Phil Reid

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1586940 — Re: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: altera: Use handle_level_irq when configured as a level_high

FromLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date2017-02-23 16:00 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: altera: Use handle_level_irq when configured as a level_high
Message-ID<te32a-2EY-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1583230
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Phil Reid <preid@electromag.com.au> wrote:

>         ret = gpiochip_irqchip_add(&altera_gc->mmchip.gc, &altera_irq_chip, 0,
> -               handle_simple_irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
> +               altera_gc->interrupt_trigger == IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH ?
> +               handle_level_irq : handle_simple_irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);

I would say: set it to handle_bad_irq() for everything and then set it
to handle_level_irq() or handle_simple_irq() in the .set_type() function
using the rq_set_handler_locked() callback like everyone else,
nicely reflecting the synthesized trigger type.

I think that would work?

Yours,
Linus Walleij

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web