Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1583366
| From | Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: altera: Use handle_level_irq when configured as a level_high |
| Date | 2017-02-17 12:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tbPcZ-3La-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tbMRQ-2p0-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tbN1w-2tF-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tbPcZ-3La-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Phil Reid <preid@electromag.com.au> wrote: > On 17/02/2017 17:23, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Phil Reid <preid@electromag.com.au> >> wrote: >>> >>> When a threaded irq handler is chained attached to one of the gpio >>> pins when configure for level irq the altera_gpio_irq_leveL_high_handler >>> does not mask the interrupt while being handled by the chained irq. >>> This resulting in the threaded irq not getting enough cycles to complete >>> quickly enough before the irq was disabled as faulty. >>> It looks like handle_level_irq should be used in this situation >>> instead of handle_simple_irq. >> >> >>> @@ -310,7 +310,8 @@ static int altera_gpio_probe(struct platform_device >>> *pdev) >>> altera_gc->interrupt_trigger = reg; >>> >>> ret = gpiochip_irqchip_add(&altera_gc->mmchip.gc, >>> &altera_irq_chip, 0, >>> - handle_simple_irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE); >>> + altera_gc->interrupt_trigger == IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH ? >>> + handle_level_irq : handle_simple_irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE); >> >> >> AFAIK, handle_bad_irq() should be used here. >> > G'day Andy > > Grepping drivers/gpio find a combination of > handle_simple_irq > handle_level_irq > handle_edge_irq > handle_bad_irq > used in gpiochip_irqchip_add Try to add date of change and amount of use. I bet handle_bad_irq() would be the winner. > The ones which use handle_bad_irq call irq_set_handler_locked in their > irq_type callback to either handle_level_irq / handle_edge_irq Yep. > So I think in this case it's correct. But I'm no expert. I dunno. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/1] gpio: altera: Use handle_level_irq when configured as a level_high Phil Reid <preid@electromag.com.au> - 2017-02-17 10:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: altera: Use handle_level_irq when configured as a level_high Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 10:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: altera: Use handle_level_irq when configured as a level_high Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-02-17 12:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: altera: Use handle_level_irq when configured as a level_high Phil Reid <preid@electromag.com.au> - 2017-02-17 12:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: altera: Use handle_level_irq when configured as a level_high Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2017-02-23 16:00 +0100
csiph-web