Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1632970 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-04-28 17:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-04-29 22:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 9 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: iov_iter_pipe warning. Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> - 2017-04-28 17:40 +0200
Re: iov_iter_pipe warning. Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2017-04-28 18:50 +0200
Re: iov_iter_pipe warning. Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> - 2017-04-28 19:00 +0200
Re: iov_iter_pipe warning. Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2017-04-28 19:30 +0200
Re: iov_iter_pipe warning. Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2017-04-28 20:30 +0200
Re: iov_iter_pipe warning. Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> - 2017-04-29 04:00 +0200
Re: iov_iter_pipe warning. Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2017-04-29 04:50 +0200
Re: iov_iter_pipe warning. Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> - 2017-04-29 18:00 +0200
[git pull] vfs.git fix (Re: iov_iter_pipe warning.) Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2017-04-29 22:50 +0200
| From | Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-28 17:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: iov_iter_pipe warning. |
| Message-ID | <tBg9X-Qc-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 06:54:30PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 03:03:18PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > > Well it's been running an hour without incident, which looks promising. > > I'll leave it run, but I'd say you're on the right track given how quick > > it reproduced so far. > > Could you try this and see if it works? What happens is that unlike > e.g. generic_file_read_iter/generic_file_write_iter, NFS O_DIRECT handling > does not make sure that iov_iter had been advanced by the amount > actually transferred - it is left advanced by the amount *requested*. Crap. So I never ran it long enough it seems. I can still hit that trace. I re-added one of your earlier debug patches, and got this.. WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 20100 at fs/splice.c:297 test_it+0x7d/0x120 CPU: 1 PID: 20100 Comm: trinity-c49 Not tainted 4.11.0-rc8-think+ #3 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x68/0x93 __warn+0xcb/0xf0 warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20 test_it+0x7d/0x120 generic_file_splice_read+0x19a/0x1e0 do_splice_to+0x79/0x90 splice_direct_to_actor+0xc6/0x280 ? generic_pipe_buf_nosteal+0x10/0x10 do_splice_direct+0x9e/0xd0 do_sendfile+0x1d7/0x3c0 SyS_sendfile64+0xc9/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x66/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25 RIP: 0033:0x7f8b83b59099 RSP: 002b:00007ffd7967da68 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000028 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000028 RCX: 00007f8b83b59099 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000131 RDI: 0000000000000195 RBP: 00007f8b840d1000 R08: 0000000000000073 R09: fffffffffffffffc R10: 000000000000040f R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000002 R13: 00007f8b840d1048 R14: 00007f8b8422fad8 R15: 00007f8b840d1000 ---[ end trace 70d344adaede0734 ]--- asked to read 1039, claims to have read 62 actual size of data in pipe 977 [0:977 ] f_op: ffffffffa02dd980, f_flags: 313346, pos: 4478229749/4478229811, size: 4478229811 ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 20100 at fs/splice.c:1017 splice_direct_to_actor+0x13f/0x280 CPU: 1 PID: 20100 Comm: trinity-c49 Tainted: G W 4.11.0-rc8-think+ #3 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x68/0x93 __warn+0xcb/0xf0 warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20 splice_direct_to_actor+0x13f/0x280 ? generic_pipe_buf_nosteal+0x10/0x10 do_splice_direct+0x9e/0xd0 do_sendfile+0x1d7/0x3c0 SyS_sendfile64+0xc9/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x66/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25 RIP: 0033:0x7f8b83b59099 RSP: 002b:00007ffd7967da68 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000028 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000028 RCX: 00007f8b83b59099 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000131 RDI: 0000000000000195 RBP: 00007f8b840d1000 R08: 0000000000000073 R09: fffffffffffffffc R10: 000000000000040f R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000002 R13: 00007f8b840d1048 R14: 00007f8b8422fad8 R15: 00007f8b840d1000 ---[ end trace 70d344adaede0735 ]--- in->f_op = ffffffffa02dd980, ->splice_write = ffffffff812b1db0 $ grep ffffffffa02dd980 /proc/kallsyms ffffffffa02dd980 r nfs4_file_operations [nfsv4] $ grep ffffffff812b1db0 /proc/kallsyms ffffffff812b1db0 T iter_file_splice_write
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-28 18:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tBhfH-1AI-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1632970 |
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:29:55AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 06:54:30PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 03:03:18PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > > > > Well it's been running an hour without incident, which looks promising. > > > I'll leave it run, but I'd say you're on the right track given how quick > > > it reproduced so far. > > > > Could you try this and see if it works? What happens is that unlike > > e.g. generic_file_read_iter/generic_file_write_iter, NFS O_DIRECT handling > > does not make sure that iov_iter had been advanced by the amount > > actually transferred - it is left advanced by the amount *requested*. > > Crap. So I never ran it long enough it seems. I can still hit that trace. > I re-added one of your earlier debug patches, and got this.. Could you send me the diff against something from mainline (identified by sha1, ideally)?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-28 19:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tBhpn-1F2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1633020 |
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 05:43:13PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:29:55AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 06:54:30PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 03:03:18PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > > Well it's been running an hour without incident, which looks promising.
> > > > I'll leave it run, but I'd say you're on the right track given how quick
> > > > it reproduced so far.
> > >
> > > Could you try this and see if it works? What happens is that unlike
> > > e.g. generic_file_read_iter/generic_file_write_iter, NFS O_DIRECT handling
> > > does not make sure that iov_iter had been advanced by the amount
> > > actually transferred - it is left advanced by the amount *requested*.
> >
> > Crap. So I never ran it long enough it seems. I can still hit that trace.
> > I re-added one of your earlier debug patches, and got this..
>
> Could you send me the diff against something from mainline (identified by
> sha1, ideally)?
currently running v4.11-rc8-75-gf83246089ca0
sunrpc bit is for the other unrelated problem I'm chasing.
note also, I saw the backtrace without the fs/splice.c changes.
diff --git a/fs/nfs/direct.c b/fs/nfs/direct.c
index aab32fc3d6a8..c1b5fed7c863 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/direct.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/direct.c
@@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ static ssize_t nfs_direct_read_schedule_iovec(struct nfs_direct_req *dreq,
if (put_dreq(dreq))
nfs_direct_complete(dreq);
- return 0;
+ return requested_bytes;
}
/**
@@ -566,7 +566,7 @@ ssize_t nfs_file_direct_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
struct nfs_direct_req *dreq;
struct nfs_lock_context *l_ctx;
- ssize_t result = -EINVAL;
+ ssize_t result = -EINVAL, requested;
size_t count = iov_iter_count(iter);
nfs_add_stats(mapping->host, NFSIOS_DIRECTREADBYTES, count);
@@ -600,14 +600,19 @@ ssize_t nfs_file_direct_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
nfs_start_io_direct(inode);
NFS_I(inode)->read_io += count;
- result = nfs_direct_read_schedule_iovec(dreq, iter, iocb->ki_pos);
+ requested = nfs_direct_read_schedule_iovec(dreq, iter, iocb->ki_pos);
nfs_end_io_direct(inode);
- if (!result) {
+ if (requested > 0) {
result = nfs_direct_wait(dreq);
- if (result > 0)
+ if (result > 0) {
+ requested -= result;
iocb->ki_pos += result;
+ }
+ iov_iter_revert(iter, requested);
+ } else {
+ result = requested;
}
out_release:
@@ -954,7 +959,7 @@ static ssize_t nfs_direct_write_schedule_iovec(struct nfs_direct_req *dreq,
if (put_dreq(dreq))
nfs_direct_write_complete(dreq);
- return 0;
+ return requested_bytes;
}
/**
@@ -979,7 +984,7 @@ static ssize_t nfs_direct_write_schedule_iovec(struct nfs_direct_req *dreq,
*/
ssize_t nfs_file_direct_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
{
- ssize_t result = -EINVAL;
+ ssize_t result = -EINVAL, requested;
size_t count;
struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
struct address_space *mapping = file->f_mapping;
@@ -1022,7 +1027,7 @@ ssize_t nfs_file_direct_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
nfs_start_io_direct(inode);
- result = nfs_direct_write_schedule_iovec(dreq, iter, pos);
+ requested = nfs_direct_write_schedule_iovec(dreq, iter, pos);
if (mapping->nrpages) {
invalidate_inode_pages2_range(mapping,
@@ -1031,13 +1036,17 @@ ssize_t nfs_file_direct_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
nfs_end_io_direct(inode);
- if (!result) {
+ if (requested > 0) {
result = nfs_direct_wait(dreq);
if (result > 0) {
+ requested -= result;
iocb->ki_pos = pos + result;
/* XXX: should check the generic_write_sync retval */
generic_write_sync(iocb, result);
}
+ iov_iter_revert(iter, requested);
+ } else {
+ result = requested;
}
out_release:
nfs_direct_req_release(dreq);
diff --git a/fs/splice.c b/fs/splice.c
index 006ba50f4ece..0e67ddf8618d 100644
--- a/fs/splice.c
+++ b/fs/splice.c
@@ -284,6 +284,43 @@ void splice_shrink_spd(struct splice_pipe_desc *spd)
kfree(spd->partial);
}
+static bool test_it(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, size_t len, long ret)
+{
+ int idx = pipe->curbuf;
+ int n = pipe->nrbufs;
+ size_t size = 0;
+ while (n--) {
+ size += pipe->bufs[idx++].len;
+ if (idx == pipe->buffers)
+ idx = 0;
+ }
+ if (WARN_ON(size != ret)) {
+ char c = '[';
+ printk(KERN_ERR "asked to read %zu, claims to have read %ld",
+ len, ret);
+ printk(KERN_CONT "actual size of data in pipe %zd ", size);
+ for (n = pipe->nrbufs, idx = pipe->curbuf; n--; ) {
+ printk(KERN_CONT "%c%d:%u", c, idx,
+ pipe->bufs[idx].len);
+ c = ',';
+ if (++idx == pipe->buffers)
+ idx = 0;
+ }
+ if (c != '[')
+ printk(KERN_CONT "]");
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
+static inline bool insane_splice_read(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
+ size_t len, long ret)
+{
+ if (ret <= 0 || pipe != current->splice_pipe)
+ return false;
+ return test_it(pipe, len, ret);
+}
+
/**
* generic_file_splice_read - splice data from file to a pipe
* @in: file to splice from
@@ -311,8 +348,14 @@ ssize_t generic_file_splice_read(struct file *in, loff_t *ppos,
kiocb.ki_pos = *ppos;
ret = call_read_iter(in, &kiocb, &to);
if (ret > 0) {
- *ppos = kiocb.ki_pos;
file_accessed(in);
+ if (unlikely(insane_splice_read(pipe, len, ret))) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "f_op: %p, f_flags: %d, pos: %lld/%lld, size: %lld",
+ in->f_op, in->f_flags, (long long)*ppos,
+ (long long)kiocb.ki_pos,
+ (long long)i_size_read(file_inode(in)));
+ }
+ *ppos = kiocb.ki_pos;
} else if (ret < 0) {
to.idx = idx;
to.iov_offset = 0;
@@ -394,7 +437,7 @@ static ssize_t default_file_splice_read(struct file *in, loff_t *ppos,
struct page **pages;
unsigned int nr_pages;
size_t offset, dummy, copied = 0;
- ssize_t res;
+ ssize_t res, old_len = len;
int i;
if (pipe->nrbufs == pipe->buffers)
@@ -448,6 +491,7 @@ static ssize_t default_file_splice_read(struct file *in, loff_t *ppos,
put_page(pages[i]);
kvfree(pages);
iov_iter_advance(&to, copied); /* truncates and discards */
+ insane_splice_read(pipe, old_len, res);
return res;
}
@@ -970,6 +1014,11 @@ ssize_t splice_direct_to_actor(struct file *in, struct splice_desc *sd,
while (len) {
size_t read_len;
loff_t pos = sd->pos, prev_pos = pos;
+ if (WARN_ON(pipe->nrbufs)) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "in->f_op = %p, ->splice_write = %p\n",
+ in->f_op,
+ sd->u.file->f_op->splice_write);
+ }
ret = do_splice_to(in, &pos, pipe, len, flags);
if (unlikely(ret <= 0))
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
index 7bfe1fb42add..eb5297573a8a 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
@@ -927,6 +927,15 @@ int svc_send(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
if (!xprt)
goto out;
+ if (WARN_ON(rqstp->rq_res.head[0].iov_len +
+ rqstp->rq_res.page_len +
+ rqstp->rq_res.tail[0].iov_len > rqstp->rq_reserved)) {
+
+ printk("dbg: rqstp->rq_res.head[0].iov_len:%ld\n", rqstp->rq_res.head[0].iov_len);
+ printk("dbg: rqstp->rq_res.page_len:%d\n", rqstp->rq_res.page_len);
+ printk("dbg: rqstp->rq_reserved:%d\n", rqstp->rq_reserved);
+ }
+
/* release the receive skb before sending the reply */
rqstp->rq_xprt->xpt_ops->xpo_release_rqst(rqstp);
@@ -936,6 +945,8 @@ int svc_send(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
xb->page_len +
xb->tail[0].iov_len;
+ WARN_ON(xb->len > rqstp->rq_reserved);
+
/* Grab mutex to serialize outgoing data. */
mutex_lock(&xprt->xpt_mutex);
if (test_bit(XPT_DEAD, &xprt->xpt_flags)
@@ -944,6 +955,7 @@ int svc_send(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
else
len = xprt->xpt_ops->xpo_sendto(rqstp);
mutex_unlock(&xprt->xpt_mutex);
+
rpc_wake_up(&xprt->xpt_bc_pending);
svc_xprt_release(rqstp);
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-28 19:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tBhSp-272-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1633025 |
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 12:50:24PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> currently running v4.11-rc8-75-gf83246089ca0
>
> sunrpc bit is for the other unrelated problem I'm chasing.
>
> note also, I saw the backtrace without the fs/splice.c changes.
Interesting... Could you add this and see if that triggers?
diff --git a/fs/splice.c b/fs/splice.c
index 540c4a44756c..12a12d9c313f 100644
--- a/fs/splice.c
+++ b/fs/splice.c
@@ -306,6 +306,9 @@ ssize_t generic_file_splice_read(struct file *in, loff_t *ppos,
kiocb.ki_pos = *ppos;
ret = call_read_iter(in, &kiocb, &to);
if (ret > 0) {
+ if (WARN_ON(iov_iter_count(&to) != len - ret))
+ printk(KERN_ERR "ops %p: was %zd, left %zd, returned %d\n",
+ in->f_op, len, iov_iter_count(&to), ret);
*ppos = kiocb.ki_pos;
file_accessed(in);
} else if (ret < 0) {
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-28 20:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tBiOt-2Nu-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1633039 |
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 06:20:25PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 12:50:24PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > currently running v4.11-rc8-75-gf83246089ca0
> >
> > sunrpc bit is for the other unrelated problem I'm chasing.
> >
> > note also, I saw the backtrace without the fs/splice.c changes.
>
> Interesting... Could you add this and see if that triggers?
Gyah... It's a bloody dumb braino in iov_iter_revert() for pipe-backed
ones. Sorry, the oneliner below should fix it.
diff --git a/lib/iov_iter.c b/lib/iov_iter.c
index f7c93568ec99..4952311422c1 100644
--- a/lib/iov_iter.c
+++ b/lib/iov_iter.c
@@ -798,7 +798,7 @@ void iov_iter_revert(struct iov_iter *i, size_t unroll)
while (1) {
size_t n = off - pipe->bufs[idx].offset;
if (unroll < n) {
- off -= (n - unroll);
+ off -= unroll;
break;
}
unroll -= n;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-29 04:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tBpPX-7Lk-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1633078 |
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 07:25:12PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 06:20:25PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 12:50:24PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > > currently running v4.11-rc8-75-gf83246089ca0 > > > > > > sunrpc bit is for the other unrelated problem I'm chasing. > > > > > > note also, I saw the backtrace without the fs/splice.c changes. > > > > Interesting... Could you add this and see if that triggers? > > Gyah... It's a bloody dumb braino in iov_iter_revert() for pipe-backed > ones. Sorry, the oneliner below should fix it. 5 hrs in, looking good so far. Dave
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-29 04:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tBqCl-8qk-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1633230 |
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 09:58:47PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 07:25:12PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 06:20:25PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 12:50:24PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > > > currently running v4.11-rc8-75-gf83246089ca0 > > > > > > > > sunrpc bit is for the other unrelated problem I'm chasing. > > > > > > > > note also, I saw the backtrace without the fs/splice.c changes. > > > > > > Interesting... Could you add this and see if that triggers? > > > > Gyah... It's a bloody dumb braino in iov_iter_revert() for pipe-backed > > ones. Sorry, the oneliner below should fix it. > > 5 hrs in, looking good so far. Mind your Tested-by on the fix?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-29 18:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tBCWR-86K-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1633235 |
On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 03:47:36AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 09:58:47PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 07:25:12PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 06:20:25PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 12:50:24PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > > > > currently running v4.11-rc8-75-gf83246089ca0 > > > > > > > > > > sunrpc bit is for the other unrelated problem I'm chasing. > > > > > > > > > > note also, I saw the backtrace without the fs/splice.c changes. > > > > > > > > Interesting... Could you add this and see if that triggers? > > > > > > Gyah... It's a bloody dumb braino in iov_iter_revert() for pipe-backed > > > ones. Sorry, the oneliner below should fix it. > > > > 5 hrs in, looking good so far. > > Mind your Tested-by on the fix? Sure. Tested-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-29 22:50 +0200 |
| Subject | [git pull] vfs.git fix (Re: iov_iter_pipe warning.) |
| Message-ID | <tBHtx-2sm-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1633304 |
On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 11:51:40AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > > Gyah... It's a bloody dumb braino in iov_iter_revert() for pipe-backed
> > > > ones. Sorry, the oneliner below should fix it.
> > >
> > > 5 hrs in, looking good so far.
> >
> > Mind your Tested-by on the fix?
>
> Sure.
>
> Tested-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
The following changes since commit 1741937d475d91ed95abb37f07e8571e23b9a7fe:
uapi: change the type of struct statx_timestamp.tv_nsec to unsigned (2017-04-26 21:19:05 -0400)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git for-linus
for you to fetch changes up to 4fa55cefee1bbecadb4c9f47d40a92f65dc44351:
fix a braino in ITER_PIPE iov_iter_revert() (2017-04-29 16:42:30 -0400)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Al Viro (1):
fix a braino in ITER_PIPE iov_iter_revert()
lib/iov_iter.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web