Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1710975

Re: [PATCH 1/2] kmemleak: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in two functions

From Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 1/2] kmemleak: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in two functions
Date 2017-08-14 16:40 +0200
Message-ID <ueoH8-5ij-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <uek0N-2qo-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <uek0O-2qo-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <uelzA-3tE-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <ueni2-4zq-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 04:02:21PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 12:14:32PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 11:35:02AM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> > > Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 10:50:22 +0200
> > > 
> > > Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in these functions.
> > > 
> > > This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> > > ---
> > >  mm/kmemleak.c | 5 +----
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/mm/kmemleak.c b/mm/kmemleak.c
> > > index 7780cd83a495..c6c798d90b2e 100644
> > > --- a/mm/kmemleak.c
> > > +++ b/mm/kmemleak.c
> > > @@ -555,7 +555,6 @@ static struct kmemleak_object *create_object(unsigned long ptr, size_t size,
> > >  
> > >  	object = kmem_cache_alloc(object_cache, gfp_kmemleak_mask(gfp));
> > >  	if (!object) {
> > > -		pr_warn("Cannot allocate a kmemleak_object structure\n");
> > >  		kmemleak_disable();
> > 
> > I don't really get what this patch is trying to achieve. Given that
> > kmemleak will be disabled after this, I'd rather know why it happened.
> 
> kmem_cache_alloc() will generate a stack trace and a bunch of more
> useful information if it fails.  The allocation isn't likely to fail,
> but if it does you will know.  The extra message is just wasting RAM.

Currently kmemleak uses __GFP_NOWARN for its own metadata allocation, so
we wouldn't see the sl*b warnings. I don't fully remember why I went for
this gfp flag, probably not to interfere with other messages printed by
the allocator (kmemleak_alloc is called from within sl*b).

I'm fine to drop __GFP_NOWARN and remove those extra messages.

-- 
Catalin

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 0/2] kmemleak: Adjustments for three function implementations SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-08-14 11:40 +0200
  [PATCH 1/2] kmemleak: Delete an error message for a failed memory  allocation in two functions SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-08-14 11:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/2] kmemleak: Delete an error message for a failed  memory allocation in two functions Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2017-08-14 13:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 1/2] kmemleak: Delete an error message for a failed memory  allocation in two functions SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-08-14 13:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 1/2] kmemleak: Delete an error message for a failed  memory allocation in two functions Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2017-08-14 15:10 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 1/2] kmemleak: Delete an error message for a failed  memory allocation in two functions Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2017-08-14 16:40 +0200
          Re: [PATCH 1/2] kmemleak: Delete an error message for a failed  memory allocation in two functions Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2017-08-14 16:50 +0200

csiph-web