Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1710974
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Fwd: struct pt_regs missing in /usr/include/ tree for eBPF program compile |
| Date | 2017-08-14 16:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ueoH8-5ij-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ua00G-KN-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <ua00G-KN-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <uaMI2-iG-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <uaMI2-iG-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <uemlX-3Zn-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Heiko Carstens
<heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> I really don't think that struct pt_regs is part of uapi and should be
> exported. We did change the layout of the pt_regs structure more than once
> and would like to be able to do so in the future as well.
On some architectures, pt_regs is definitely part of the uapi, as
we define sigcontext in terms of pt_regs:
arch/cris/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h: struct pt_regs regs;
/* needs to be first */
arch/m32r/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h: struct pt_regs *sc_pt_regs;
arch/microblaze/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h: struct pt_regs regs;
arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h: struct pt_regs __user *regs;
arch/tile/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h: * struct sigcontext has the
same shape as struct pt_regs,
arch/unicore32/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h: struct pt_regs regs;
On other architectures, they just use the same layout but different names.
arm32 also uses pt_regs in struct kvm_regs, the other ones don't:
arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h: struct pt_regs usr_regs;
/* R0_usr - R14_usr, PC, CPSR */
> In addition what about compat processes? Most architectures define their
> struct pt_regs with "unsigned long" members, which have different sizes for
> 32/64 bit, while the structure on the kernel stack contains 64 bit
> members. And as far as I know the bpf test cases want to access the kernel
> stack, no? Then this seems to be broken also.
Right.
Arnd
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Fwd: struct pt_regs missing in /usr/include/ tree for eBPF program compile Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> - 2017-08-14 14:10 +0200 Re: Fwd: struct pt_regs missing in /usr/include/ tree for eBPF program compile Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-08-14 16:40 +0200 Re: Fwd: struct pt_regs missing in /usr/include/ tree for eBPF program compile Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> - 2017-08-23 07:10 +0200
csiph-web