Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1609057
| From | Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: lockdep warning: console vs. mem hotplug |
| Date | 2017-03-25 02:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <toIQp-1P9-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tn9i1-7Yx-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tnjU6-6J9-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <toHrk-ZP-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <toInn-1Fh-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On (03/24/17 21:08), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Sebastian, does this change make lockdep happy?
> >
> > it removes console drivers from the __offline_isolated_pages(). not the
> > best solution I can think of, but the simplest one.
> >
> > ---
> >
> > mm/page_alloc.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > index f749b7ff7c50..eb61e6ab5f4f 100644
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -7705,7 +7705,7 @@ __offline_isolated_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> > BUG_ON(!PageBuddy(page));
> > order = page_order(page);
> > #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
> > - pr_info("remove from free list %lx %d %lx\n",
> > + printk_deferred(KERN_INFO "remove from free list %lx %d %lx\n",
> > pfn, 1 << order, end_pfn);
> > #endif
> > list_del(&page->lru);
>
>
> My fear is that this will trigger for any printk in page_alloc.c under
> the zone lock.
absolutely true.
I Cc'd debugobjects, mm and sclp_console maintainers because the
real (smart) solution to the problem is somewhere there.
another problem (not reported) is that we have conflicting dependencies
mod_timer -> sclp_console
sclp_console -> mod_timer
which can result in a deadlock:
mod_timer -> debugobjects -> printk -> sclp_console -> mod_timer
this one, I think, can be addressed by switching to a printk_safe in debugobjects.
// I'm traveling now. there will be delays in replies, sorry.
-ss
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: lockdep warning: console vs. mem hotplug Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 05:50 +0100
Re: lockdep warning: console vs. mem hotplug Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 06:10 +0100
Re: lockdep warning: console vs. mem hotplug Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 01:10 +0100
Re: lockdep warning: console vs. mem hotplug Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-03-25 02:10 +0100
Re: lockdep warning: console vs. mem hotplug Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 02:40 +0100
Re: lockdep warning: console vs. mem hotplug Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-03-25 12:00 +0100
csiph-web