Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1609050

Re: lockdep warning: console vs. mem hotplug

From Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: lockdep warning: console vs. mem hotplug
Date 2017-03-25 02:10 +0100
Message-ID <toInn-1Fh-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tn9i1-7Yx-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tnjU6-6J9-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <toHrk-ZP-35@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Sat, 25 Mar 2017 09:04:42 +0900
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> wrote:

> On (03/21/17 13:44), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> [..]
> > so we probably can
> > 
> > 
> > 1) move pr_info() out of zone->lock in __offline_isolated_pages().
> >    meh...
> > 
> > 
> > 2) switch to printk_deferred() in __offline_isolated_pages().
> >    meh.. there might a bunch of other printks done from under zone->lock.
> > 
> > 
> > 3) move add_timer() out of sclp_con_lock console in sclp_console_write().
> >    well, there can be other consoles that do something similar.
> > 
> > 
> > 4) ... something smart.  
> 
> 
> Sebastian, does this change make lockdep happy?
> 
> it removes console drivers from the __offline_isolated_pages(). not the
> best solution I can think of, but the simplest one.
> 
> ---
> 
>  mm/page_alloc.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index f749b7ff7c50..eb61e6ab5f4f 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -7705,7 +7705,7 @@ __offline_isolated_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
>  		BUG_ON(!PageBuddy(page));
>  		order = page_order(page);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
> -		pr_info("remove from free list %lx %d %lx\n",
> +		printk_deferred(KERN_INFO "remove from free list %lx %d %lx\n",
>  			pfn, 1 << order, end_pfn);
>  #endif
>  		list_del(&page->lru);


My fear is that this will trigger for any printk in page_alloc.c under
the zone lock.

-- Steve

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: lockdep warning: console vs. mem hotplug Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 05:50 +0100
  Re: lockdep warning: console vs. mem hotplug Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 06:10 +0100
  Re: lockdep warning: console vs. mem hotplug Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 01:10 +0100
    Re: lockdep warning: console vs. mem hotplug Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-03-25 02:10 +0100
      Re: lockdep warning: console vs. mem hotplug Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 02:40 +0100
    Re: lockdep warning: console vs. mem hotplug Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-03-25 12:00 +0100

csiph-web