Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another process in the same cgroup

From	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another process in the same cgroup
Date	2016-07-18 16:00 +0200
Message-ID	<rWhfs-6UE-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <rU8gh-6Wm-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rUeYq-3aN-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <rUOSe-1Ni-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <rUQU1-31t-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rVeD0-QX-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On 07/15, Shayan Pooya wrote:
>
> >> --- x/kernel/sched/core.c
> >> +++ x/kernel/sched/core.c
> >> @@ -2793,8 +2793,11 @@ asmlinkage __visible void schedule_tail(struct task_struct *prev)
> >>         balance_callback(rq);
> >>         preempt_enable();
> >>
> >> -       if (current->set_child_tid)
> >> +       if (current->set_child_tid) {
> >> +               mem_cgroup_oom_enable();
> >>                 put_user(task_pid_vnr(current), current->set_child_tid);
> >> +               mem_cgroup_oom_disable();
> >> +       }
> >>  }
> >>
> >>  /*
>
> I tried this patch and I still see the same stuck processes (assuming
> that's what you were curious about).

Of course. Because I am stupid. Firtsly, I forgot to include another
change in fault.c. And now I see that change was wrong anyway.

I'll try to make another debugging patch today later, but let me repeat
that it won't fix the real problem anyway.

Thanks, and sorry for wasting your time.

Oleg.

Thread

Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-07-11 08:50 +0200
  Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Shayan Pooya <shayan@liveve.org> - 2016-07-11 20:40 +0200
    Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-07-12 09:20 +0200
      Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Shayan Pooya <shayan@liveve.org> - 2016-07-12 17:40 +0200
        Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru> - 2016-07-12 18:00 +0200
          Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2016-07-12 19:00 +0200
          Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Shayan Pooya <shayan@liveve.org> - 2016-07-13 01:10 +0200
            Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2016-07-14 15:30 +0200
              Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Shayan Pooya <shayan@liveve.org> - 2016-07-14 17:40 +0200
                Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Shayan Pooya <shayan@liveve.org> - 2016-07-15 19:00 +0200
                Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2016-07-18 16:00 +0200
        Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-07-13 10:10 +0200
  Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-07-12 09:20 +0200

csiph-web