Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1441106

Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another process in the same cgroup

From Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another process in the same cgroup
Date 2016-07-12 09:20 +0200
Message-ID <rU093-1KR-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rTaau-16A-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rTDct-3r7-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rTNvb-1Nk-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <rTOhz-2j1-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon 11-07-16 11:33:19, Shayan Pooya wrote:
> >> Could you post the stack trace of the hung oom victim? Also could you
> >> post the full kernel log?
> 
> With strace, when running 500 concurrent mem-hog tasks on the same
> kernel, 33 of them failed with:
> 
> strace: ../sysdeps/nptl/fork.c:136: __libc_fork: Assertion
> `THREAD_GETMEM (self, tid) != ppid' failed.
> 
> Which is: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15392
> And discussed before at: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/6/470 but that
> patch was not accepted.

OK, so the problem is that the oom killed task doesn't report the futex
release properly? If yes then I fail to see how that is memcg specific.
Could you try to clarify what you consider a bug again, please? I am not
really sure I understand this report.

Thanks!

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-07-11 08:50 +0200
  Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Shayan Pooya <shayan@liveve.org> - 2016-07-11 20:40 +0200
    Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-07-12 09:20 +0200
      Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Shayan Pooya <shayan@liveve.org> - 2016-07-12 17:40 +0200
        Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru> - 2016-07-12 18:00 +0200
          Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2016-07-12 19:00 +0200
          Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Shayan Pooya <shayan@liveve.org> - 2016-07-13 01:10 +0200
            Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2016-07-14 15:30 +0200
              Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Shayan Pooya <shayan@liveve.org> - 2016-07-14 17:40 +0200
                Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Shayan Pooya <shayan@liveve.org> - 2016-07-15 19:00 +0200
                Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2016-07-18 16:00 +0200
        Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-07-13 10:10 +0200
  Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-07-12 09:20 +0200

csiph-web