Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1444454

Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another process in the same cgroup

From Shayan Pooya <shayan@liveve.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another process in the same cgroup
Date 2016-07-15 19:00 +0200
Message-ID <rVeD0-QX-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <rU7WW-6Ps-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <rU8gh-6Wm-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rUeYq-3aN-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <rUOSe-1Ni-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <rUQU1-31t-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


>> I am just curious... can you reproduce the problem reliably? If yes, can you try
>> the patch below ? Just in case, this is not the real fix in any case...
>
> Yes. It deterministically results in hung processes in vanilla kernel.
> I'll try this patch.

I'll have to correct this. I can reproduce this issue easily on
high-end servers and normal laptops. But for some reason it does not
happen very often in vmware guests (maybe related to lower
parallelism).

>> --- x/kernel/sched/core.c
>> +++ x/kernel/sched/core.c
>> @@ -2793,8 +2793,11 @@ asmlinkage __visible void schedule_tail(struct task_struct *prev)
>>         balance_callback(rq);
>>         preempt_enable();
>>
>> -       if (current->set_child_tid)
>> +       if (current->set_child_tid) {
>> +               mem_cgroup_oom_enable();
>>                 put_user(task_pid_vnr(current), current->set_child_tid);
>> +               mem_cgroup_oom_disable();
>> +       }
>>  }
>>
>>  /*

I tried this patch and I still see the same stuck processes (assuming
that's what you were curious about).

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-07-11 08:50 +0200
  Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Shayan Pooya <shayan@liveve.org> - 2016-07-11 20:40 +0200
    Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-07-12 09:20 +0200
      Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Shayan Pooya <shayan@liveve.org> - 2016-07-12 17:40 +0200
        Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru> - 2016-07-12 18:00 +0200
          Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2016-07-12 19:00 +0200
          Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Shayan Pooya <shayan@liveve.org> - 2016-07-13 01:10 +0200
            Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2016-07-14 15:30 +0200
              Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Shayan Pooya <shayan@liveve.org> - 2016-07-14 17:40 +0200
                Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Shayan Pooya <shayan@liveve.org> - 2016-07-15 19:00 +0200
                Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2016-07-18 16:00 +0200
        Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-07-13 10:10 +0200
  Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another  process in the same cgroup Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-07-12 09:20 +0200

csiph-web