Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1444454
| From | Shayan Pooya <shayan@liveve.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another process in the same cgroup |
| Date | 2016-07-15 19:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rVeD0-QX-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <rU7WW-6Ps-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <rU8gh-6Wm-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rUeYq-3aN-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <rUOSe-1Ni-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <rUQU1-31t-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
>> I am just curious... can you reproduce the problem reliably? If yes, can you try
>> the patch below ? Just in case, this is not the real fix in any case...
>
> Yes. It deterministically results in hung processes in vanilla kernel.
> I'll try this patch.
I'll have to correct this. I can reproduce this issue easily on
high-end servers and normal laptops. But for some reason it does not
happen very often in vmware guests (maybe related to lower
parallelism).
>> --- x/kernel/sched/core.c
>> +++ x/kernel/sched/core.c
>> @@ -2793,8 +2793,11 @@ asmlinkage __visible void schedule_tail(struct task_struct *prev)
>> balance_callback(rq);
>> preempt_enable();
>>
>> - if (current->set_child_tid)
>> + if (current->set_child_tid) {
>> + mem_cgroup_oom_enable();
>> put_user(task_pid_vnr(current), current->set_child_tid);
>> + mem_cgroup_oom_disable();
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> /*
I tried this patch and I still see the same stuck processes (assuming
that's what you were curious about).
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another process in the same cgroup Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-07-11 08:50 +0200
Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another process in the same cgroup Shayan Pooya <shayan@liveve.org> - 2016-07-11 20:40 +0200
Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another process in the same cgroup Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-07-12 09:20 +0200
Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another process in the same cgroup Shayan Pooya <shayan@liveve.org> - 2016-07-12 17:40 +0200
Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another process in the same cgroup Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru> - 2016-07-12 18:00 +0200
Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another process in the same cgroup Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2016-07-12 19:00 +0200
Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another process in the same cgroup Shayan Pooya <shayan@liveve.org> - 2016-07-13 01:10 +0200
Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another process in the same cgroup Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2016-07-14 15:30 +0200
Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another process in the same cgroup Shayan Pooya <shayan@liveve.org> - 2016-07-14 17:40 +0200
Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another process in the same cgroup Shayan Pooya <shayan@liveve.org> - 2016-07-15 19:00 +0200
Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another process in the same cgroup Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2016-07-18 16:00 +0200
Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another process in the same cgroup Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-07-13 10:10 +0200
Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another process in the same cgroup Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-07-12 09:20 +0200
csiph-web