Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1442151
| From | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another process in the same cgroup |
| Date | 2016-07-13 10:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rUnp0-kO-37@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <rTDct-3r7-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rTNvb-1Nk-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <rTOhz-2j1-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <rU093-1KR-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rU7WW-6Ps-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue 12-07-16 08:35:06, Shayan Pooya wrote: > >> With strace, when running 500 concurrent mem-hog tasks on the same > >> kernel, 33 of them failed with: > >> > >> strace: ../sysdeps/nptl/fork.c:136: __libc_fork: Assertion > >> `THREAD_GETMEM (self, tid) != ppid' failed. > >> > >> Which is: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15392 > >> And discussed before at: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/6/470 but that > >> patch was not accepted. > > > > OK, so the problem is that the oom killed task doesn't report the futex > > release properly? If yes then I fail to see how that is memcg specific. > > Could you try to clarify what you consider a bug again, please? I am not > > really sure I understand this report. > > It looks like it is just a very easy way to reproduce the problem that > Konstantin described in that lkml thread. That patch was not accepted > and I see no other fixes for that issue upstream. Here is a copy of > his root-cause analysis from said thread: > > Whole sequence looks like: task calls fork, glibc calls syscall clone with > CLONE_CHILD_SETTID and passes pointer to TLS THREAD_SELF->tid as argument. > Child task gets read-only copy of VM including TLS. Child calls put_user() > to handle CLONE_CHILD_SETTID from schedule_tail(). put_user() trigger page > fault and it fails because do_wp_page() hits memcg limit without invoking > OOM-killer because this is page-fault from kernel-space. Put_user returns > -EFAULT, which is ignored. Child returns into user-space and catches here > assert (THREAD_GETMEM (self, tid) != ppid), glibc tries to print something > but hangs on deadlock on internal locks. Halt and catch fire. OK, I see! Thanks for the clarification. So the bug is that put_user return value is ignored. Let's see whether Konstantin's patch will be accepted or Oleg comes with something else. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another process in the same cgroup Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-07-11 08:50 +0200
Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another process in the same cgroup Shayan Pooya <shayan@liveve.org> - 2016-07-11 20:40 +0200
Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another process in the same cgroup Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-07-12 09:20 +0200
Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another process in the same cgroup Shayan Pooya <shayan@liveve.org> - 2016-07-12 17:40 +0200
Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another process in the same cgroup Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru> - 2016-07-12 18:00 +0200
Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another process in the same cgroup Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2016-07-12 19:00 +0200
Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another process in the same cgroup Shayan Pooya <shayan@liveve.org> - 2016-07-13 01:10 +0200
Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another process in the same cgroup Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2016-07-14 15:30 +0200
Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another process in the same cgroup Shayan Pooya <shayan@liveve.org> - 2016-07-14 17:40 +0200
Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another process in the same cgroup Shayan Pooya <shayan@liveve.org> - 2016-07-15 19:00 +0200
Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another process in the same cgroup Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2016-07-18 16:00 +0200
Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another process in the same cgroup Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-07-13 10:10 +0200
Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another process in the same cgroup Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-07-12 09:20 +0200
csiph-web