Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1313336

Re: [RFC PATCH v3] irqchip: Add support for Tango interrupt controller

From Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC PATCH v3] irqchip: Add support for Tango interrupt controller
Date 2016-01-20 17:30 +0100
Message-ID <qT3NU-CC-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <qSkxs-2ZZ-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSla9-3jC-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qT3uy-vq-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qT3Ed-yP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qT3NU-CC-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com> writes:

> On 20/01/2016 17:10, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>
>> Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> 
>>>> +	if (of_property_read_u32(node, "reg", &ctl))
>>>> +		panic("%s: failed to get reg base", node->name);
>>>> +
>>>> +	chip = kzalloc(sizeof(*chip), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> +	chip->ctl = ctl;
>>>> +	chip->base = base;
>> 
>> As I said before, this assumes the outer DT node uses a ranges
>> property.  Normally reg properties work the same whether they specify an
>> offset within an outer "ranges" or have a full address directly.  It
>> would be easy enough to make this work with either, so I don't see any
>> reason not to.
>
> IIRC, I was told very early in the review process that the ranges prop
> was mandatory. Lemme look for it... It was Arnd:
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/444131/focus=444207
>
>> You are missing a ranges property that describes what address
>> space these addresses are in.
>>
>> 'ranges;' would be wrong here, as the interrupt controller is
>> not a bus. If you have no ranges property, the bus is interpreted
>> as having its own address space with no relation to the parent bus
>> (e.g. an I2C bus uses addresses that are not memory mapped).
>> 
>> Just list the addresses that are actually decoded by child
>> devices here.
>
> Did I misunderstand?

It's still possible to create such a device tree, and that will fail in
very hard to debug ways.  Better to be a bit robust.

-- 
Måns Rullgård

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[RFC PATCH v2] irqchip: Add support for Tango interrupt controller Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com> - 2016-01-18 14:10 +0100
  Re: [RFC PATCH v2] irqchip: Add support for Tango interrupt controller Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2016-01-18 14:10 +0100
  Re: [RFC PATCH v2] irqchip: Add support for Tango interrupt  controller Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com> - 2016-01-18 17:10 +0100
    [RFC PATCH v3] irqchip: Add support for Tango interrupt controller Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com> - 2016-01-18 17:50 +0100
      Re: [RFC PATCH v3] irqchip: Add support for Tango interrupt  controller Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2016-01-20 17:10 +0100
        Re: [RFC PATCH v3] irqchip: Add support for Tango interrupt controller Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2016-01-20 17:20 +0100
          Re: [RFC PATCH v3] irqchip: Add support for Tango interrupt controller Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2016-01-20 17:30 +0100
            Re: [RFC PATCH v3] irqchip: Add support for Tango interrupt  controller Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com> - 2016-01-20 17:40 +0100
              Re: [RFC PATCH v3] irqchip: Add support for Tango interrupt controller Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2016-01-20 17:40 +0100
                Re: [RFC PATCH v3] irqchip: Add support for Tango interrupt  controller Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com> - 2016-01-20 17:50 +0100
                Re: [RFC PATCH v3] irqchip: Add support for Tango interrupt controller Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2016-01-20 19:10 +0100
                Re: [RFC PATCH v3] irqchip: Add support for Tango interrupt  controller Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com> - 2016-01-22 17:00 +0100
                Re: [RFC PATCH v3] irqchip: Add support for Tango interrupt controller Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2016-01-22 17:40 +0100
                Re: [RFC PATCH v3] irqchip: Add support for Tango interrupt  controller Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com> - 2016-01-22 17:40 +0100
                Re: [RFC PATCH v3] irqchip: Add support for Tango interrupt controller Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2016-01-22 17:40 +0100
                Re: [RFC PATCH v3] irqchip: Add support for Tango interrupt  controller Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com> - 2016-01-22 17:50 +0100
                Re: [RFC PATCH v3] irqchip: Add support for Tango interrupt controller Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2016-01-22 17:50 +0100
          Re: [RFC PATCH v3] irqchip: Add support for Tango interrupt  controller Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2016-01-20 17:30 +0100
          Re: [RFC PATCH v3] irqchip: Add support for Tango interrupt controller Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2016-01-20 17:30 +0100
          Re: [RFC PATCH v3] irqchip: Add support for Tango interrupt  controller Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com> - 2016-01-20 17:30 +0100
            Re: [RFC PATCH v3] irqchip: Add support for Tango interrupt  controller Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com> - 2016-01-20 18:10 +0100
              Re: [RFC PATCH v3] irqchip: Add support for Tango interrupt controller Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2016-01-20 18:10 +0100
            Re: [RFC PATCH v3] irqchip: Add support for Tango interrupt  controller Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-01-20 18:10 +0100
              Re: [RFC PATCH v3] irqchip: Add support for Tango interrupt controller Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2016-01-20 18:10 +0100

csiph-web