Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #263120
| From | Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | [SOLVED] Re: bookworm which repo? |
| Date | 2023-11-04 14:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <Hwpcd-35bK-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <HwopP-34E4-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <Hwozv-34X5-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Thanks for the advice. So, bookworm-updates is recommended, bookworm-backports is optional. At upgrade time the documentation said something else (I suppose, because it was an upgrade no fresh installation) Well, the problem is solved. Thanks for the hint. Best Hans > So, should I use all four entries or do you recommend to skip one of it? > > https://wiki.debian.org/SourcesList > > Cheers, > David.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
bookworm which repo? Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2023-11-04 14:00 +0100
Re: bookworm which repo? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2023-11-04 14:10 +0100
[SOLVED] Re: bookworm which repo? Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2023-11-04 14:50 +0100
csiph-web