Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #263118

Re: bookworm which repo?

Show all headers | View raw

On Sat 04 Nov 2023 at 13:50:34 (+0100), Hans wrote:

> A fresh install is showing an entry in /etc/apt/sources.list for
> 
> 1. bookworm 
> 2. bookworm-security  
> and 
> 3. bookworm-updates
> 
> The last one is somehow confusing me, either I missed somethin in the 
> documentation or soemthing has changed since the release of bookworm.
> 
> Just a question. The first two are clear, but "bookworm-updates" is new for me. 
> 
> Instead of this I entered "bookworm-backports", which was, as the 
> documentation said, recommended at time of the installation  
> 
> However, please note: I did not do a fresh install at the release date of 
> bookworm, but an upgrade from buster to bookworm, so it might 
> be, the entry for "bookworm-backports" was recommended at that time. 
> 
> So, should I use all four entries or do you recommend to skip one of it?

  https://wiki.debian.org/SourcesList

Cheers,
David.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

bookworm  which repo? Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2023-11-04 14:00 +0100
  Re: bookworm  which repo? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2023-11-04 14:10 +0100
    [SOLVED] Re: bookworm  which repo? Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2023-11-04 14:50 +0100

csiph-web