Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #263116 > unrolled thread

bookworm which repo?

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user

Contents

  bookworm  which repo? Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2023-11-04 14:00 +0100
    Re: bookworm  which repo? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2023-11-04 14:10 +0100
      [SOLVED] Re: bookworm  which repo? Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2023-11-04 14:50 +0100

#263116 — bookworm which repo?

Hi folks, 

just a little question.

A fresh install is showing an entry in /etc/apt/sources.list for

1. bookworm 
2. bookworm-security  
and 
3. bookworm-updates

The last one is somehow confusing me, either I missed somethin in the 
documentation or soemthing has changed since the release of bookworm.

Just a question. The first two are clear, but "bookworm-updates" is new for me. 

Instead of this I entered "bookworm-backports", which was, as the 
documentation said, recommended at time of the installation  

However, please note: I did not do a fresh install at the release date of 
bookworm, but an upgrade from buster to bookworm, so it might 
be, the entry for "bookworm-backports" was recommended at that time. 

So, should I use all four entries or do you recommend to skip one of it?

My system is running fine!

Best regards

Hans

 

 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#263118

On Sat 04 Nov 2023 at 13:50:34 (+0100), Hans wrote:

> A fresh install is showing an entry in /etc/apt/sources.list for
> 
> 1. bookworm 
> 2. bookworm-security  
> and 
> 3. bookworm-updates
> 
> The last one is somehow confusing me, either I missed somethin in the 
> documentation or soemthing has changed since the release of bookworm.
> 
> Just a question. The first two are clear, but "bookworm-updates" is new for me. 
> 
> Instead of this I entered "bookworm-backports", which was, as the 
> documentation said, recommended at time of the installation  
> 
> However, please note: I did not do a fresh install at the release date of 
> bookworm, but an upgrade from buster to bookworm, so it might 
> be, the entry for "bookworm-backports" was recommended at that time. 
> 
> So, should I use all four entries or do you recommend to skip one of it?

  https://wiki.debian.org/SourcesList

Cheers,
David.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#263120 — [SOLVED] Re: bookworm which repo?

Thanks for the advice. 

So, bookworm-updates is recommended, bookworm-backports is optional.

At upgrade time the documentation said something else (I suppose, because it 
was an upgrade no fresh installation)

Well,  the problem is solved.

Thanks for the hint.

Best

Hans



> So, should I use all four entries or do you recommend to skip one of it?
> 
>   https://wiki.debian.org/SourcesList
> 
> Cheers,
> David.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user

csiph-web