Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #234600

Re: ubuntu/snap future

From riveravaldez <riveravaldezmail@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: ubuntu/snap future
Date 2021-04-29 02:20 +0200
Message-ID <C92zo-3ZD-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (7 earlier) <C1TKx-4g6-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <C1VMl-5sr-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <C23qy-1CD-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <C243f-24F-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <C2mtb-5fN-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 4/7/21, Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> wrote:
>> riveravaldez wrote:
>>
>> Hi, I was under the impression that (besides being fully open) Flatpak
>> had
>> better confinement method that Canonical's Snap, anybody knows if this is
>> correct?
>
> "Two years ago I wrote about then heavily-pushed Flatpak,
> self-proclaimed "Future of Apps on Linux". The article
> criticized the following three major flows in Flatpak:
>
>     Most of the apps have full access to the host system but
>         users are misled to believe the apps are sandboxed
>     The flatpak runtimes and apps do not get security updates
>     Flatpak breaks many aspects of desktop integration"
>
>     -- https://flatkill.org/2020/
>
> (the article then says that they fixed some desktop integration
> issues)

Hi, just in case anyone is interested in the following of this, I've
asked at Flatpak's mail-list about the issues mentioned in that
article and someone from GNOME pointed me to this post[0],
which I still didn't read. So, at the moment, just reporting. ;)

Best regards.

[0] https://ramcq.net/2018/10/15/flatpak-sandbox-security/

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

ubuntu/snap future George Shuklin <george.shuklin@gmail.com> - 2021-04-03 18:40 +0200
  Re: ubuntu/snap future "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2021-04-03 19:00 +0200
  Re: ubuntu/snap future Paul Johnson <baloo@ursamundi.org> - 2021-04-06 02:00 +0200
    Re: ubuntu/snap future Peter Ehlert <peter@sdi-baja.com> - 2021-04-06 03:10 +0200
    Re: ubuntu/snap future Yoann LE BARS <yoann@le-bars.net> - 2021-04-06 11:30 +0200
      Re: ubuntu/snap future Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-04-06 13:50 +0200
        Re: ubuntu/snap future Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2021-04-06 14:30 +0200
        ubuntu/snap future riveravaldez <riveravaldezmail@gmail.com> - 2021-04-07 05:30 +0200
          Re: ubuntu/snap future Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2021-04-07 12:20 +0200
            Re: ubuntu/snap future riveravaldez <riveravaldezmail@gmail.com> - 2021-04-09 09:20 +0200
              Re: ubuntu/snap future <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-04-09 09:30 +0200
                Re: ubuntu/snap future riveravaldez <riveravaldezmail@gmail.com> - 2021-04-09 11:40 +0200
                Re: ubuntu/snap future <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-04-09 13:00 +0200
                Re: ubuntu/snap future Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2021-04-09 15:00 +0200
                Re: ubuntu/snap future <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-04-09 15:30 +0200
                Re: ubuntu/snap future Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-04-09 19:50 +0200
                Re: ubuntu/snap future Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-04-09 20:30 +0200
                Re: ubuntu/snap future George Shuklin <george.shuklin@gmail.com> - 2021-04-10 16:10 +0200
                Re: ubuntu/snap future riveravaldez <riveravaldezmail@gmail.com> - 2021-04-29 02:20 +0200
                Re: ubuntu/snap future Yoann LE BARS <yoann@le-bars.net> - 2021-04-09 13:10 +0200
                Re: ubuntu/snap future <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-04-09 13:40 +0200
                Re: ubuntu/snap future Yoann LE BARS <yoann@le-bars.net> - 2021-04-09 13:50 +0200
                Re: ubuntu/snap future <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-04-09 14:50 +0200
                Re: ubuntu/snap future Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2021-04-09 15:10 +0200
                Re: ubuntu/snap future <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-04-09 15:40 +0200
                Re: ubuntu/snap future Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2021-04-09 17:10 +0200
                Re: ubuntu/snap future <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-04-09 19:00 +0200
                Re: ubuntu/snap future Yoann LE BARS <yoann@le-bars.net> - 2021-04-09 18:10 +0200
                Re: ubuntu/snap future Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-04-09 19:30 +0200
                Re: ubuntu/snap future <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-04-09 19:30 +0200
                Re: ubuntu/snap future Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2021-04-09 14:10 +0200
                Re: ubuntu/snap future <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-04-09 15:00 +0200
                Re: ubuntu/snap future Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2021-04-09 15:30 +0200
                Re: ubuntu/snap future tomas@tuxteam.de - 2021-04-09 15:40 +0200
                Re: ubuntu/snap future The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2021-04-09 15:50 +0200
                Re: ubuntu/snap future <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-04-09 16:20 +0200
                Re: ubuntu/snap future Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2021-04-09 16:20 +0200
                Re: ubuntu/snap future Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2021-04-09 16:30 +0200
                Re: ubuntu/snap future Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2021-04-09 16:20 +0200
                Re: ubuntu/snap future Yoann LE BARS <yoann@le-bars.net> - 2021-04-09 18:20 +0200
                Re: ubuntu/snap future Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-04-09 19:50 +0200
                Re: ubuntu/snap future Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2021-04-09 20:40 +0200
                Re: ubuntu/snap future Linux-Fan <Ma_Sys.ma@web.de> - 2021-04-09 21:40 +0200
                Re: ubuntu/snap future Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2021-04-09 22:10 +0200
              Re: ubuntu/snap future Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2021-04-09 14:10 +0200
        Re: ubuntu/snap future George Shuklin <george.shuklin@gmail.com> - 2021-04-10 16:10 +0200

csiph-web