Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #234008
| From | riveravaldez <riveravaldezmail@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: ubuntu/snap future |
| Date | 2021-04-09 09:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <C1TAR-4d3-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <C0Hip-7RR-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <C0Qc1-5cV-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <C0Snv-6u5-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <C173b-7v8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <C1drY-3c0-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 4/7/21, Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> wrote: > riveravaldez wrote: >> On Tuesday, April 6, 2021, Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> wrote: >> > On Tue 06 Apr 2021 at 11:20:58 +0200, Yoann LE BARS wrote: >> > >> > I had occasion to install Zoom a few weeks ago;'snap install >> > zoom-client'. >> > Everything went smoothly and I quite like having this proprietary >> > package >> > strictly confined. >> >> Hi, I was under the impression that (besides being fully open) Flatpak >> had >> better confinement method that Canonical's Snap, anybody knows if this is >> correct? > > > "Two years ago I wrote about then heavily-pushed Flatpak, > self-proclaimed "Future of Apps on Linux". The article > criticized the following three major flows in Flatpak: > > Most of the apps have full access to the host system but > users are misled to believe the apps are sandboxed > The flatpak runtimes and apps do not get security updates > Flatpak breaks many aspects of desktop integration" > > -- https://flatkill.org/2020/ > > (the article then says that they fixed some desktop integration > issues) Thanks a lot for the link and info, Dan, very informative. I'm still with the doubt. Even considering all this: which has better (or less-worse) confinement, Flatpak or Snap (or AppImage)? Trying to decide which is less-worse in a scenario of unavoidable use of some of these. Thanks again!
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
ubuntu/snap future George Shuklin <george.shuklin@gmail.com> - 2021-04-03 18:40 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2021-04-03 19:00 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future Paul Johnson <baloo@ursamundi.org> - 2021-04-06 02:00 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future Peter Ehlert <peter@sdi-baja.com> - 2021-04-06 03:10 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future Yoann LE BARS <yoann@le-bars.net> - 2021-04-06 11:30 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-04-06 13:50 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2021-04-06 14:30 +0200
ubuntu/snap future riveravaldez <riveravaldezmail@gmail.com> - 2021-04-07 05:30 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2021-04-07 12:20 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future riveravaldez <riveravaldezmail@gmail.com> - 2021-04-09 09:20 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-04-09 09:30 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future riveravaldez <riveravaldezmail@gmail.com> - 2021-04-09 11:40 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-04-09 13:00 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2021-04-09 15:00 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-04-09 15:30 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-04-09 19:50 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-04-09 20:30 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future George Shuklin <george.shuklin@gmail.com> - 2021-04-10 16:10 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future riveravaldez <riveravaldezmail@gmail.com> - 2021-04-29 02:20 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future Yoann LE BARS <yoann@le-bars.net> - 2021-04-09 13:10 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-04-09 13:40 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future Yoann LE BARS <yoann@le-bars.net> - 2021-04-09 13:50 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-04-09 14:50 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2021-04-09 15:10 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-04-09 15:40 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2021-04-09 17:10 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-04-09 19:00 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future Yoann LE BARS <yoann@le-bars.net> - 2021-04-09 18:10 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-04-09 19:30 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-04-09 19:30 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2021-04-09 14:10 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-04-09 15:00 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2021-04-09 15:30 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future tomas@tuxteam.de - 2021-04-09 15:40 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2021-04-09 15:50 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-04-09 16:20 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2021-04-09 16:20 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2021-04-09 16:30 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2021-04-09 16:20 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future Yoann LE BARS <yoann@le-bars.net> - 2021-04-09 18:20 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-04-09 19:50 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2021-04-09 20:40 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future Linux-Fan <Ma_Sys.ma@web.de> - 2021-04-09 21:40 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2021-04-09 22:10 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2021-04-09 14:10 +0200
Re: ubuntu/snap future George Shuklin <george.shuklin@gmail.com> - 2021-04-10 16:10 +0200
csiph-web